Constructing Religious Tolerance in Popular Digital Discourse: A Barthesian Semiotic Reading of Interfaith Representation in Indonesian YouTube Podcasts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/jors.v1i2.150Keywords:
Barthesian semiotics, digital discourse, interfaith representation, religious tolerance, YouTube podcastsAbstract
This study examines how religious tolerance is constructed and articulated within popular digital discourse through a semiotic analysis of interfaith representation in Indonesian YouTube podcasts. The purpose of this research is to explore the layers of meaning embedded in a widely circulated podcast episode featuring six religious leaders from different faith traditions who engage in public dialogue during a shared religious celebration. Grounded in a qualitative descriptive approach and informed by a constructivist paradigm, the study employs Roland Barthes’ semiotic framework to analyze denotative, connotative, and mythical meanings conveyed through visual symbols, verbal interactions, and narrative structures within the selected digital content. Data were collected through non-participant observation, transcription of audiovisual material, and document analysis, allowing for an in-depth interpretation of signs and symbols that shape the representation of interfaith relations. The findings reveal that, at the denotative level, religious tolerance is signified through the visible presence of diverse religious attributes and equal participation among faith representatives. At the connotative level, tolerance is constructed through dialogic exchanges characterized by mutual respect, openness, and acknowledgment of difference without antagonism. At the mythical level, these representations reproduce and reinforce the national ethos of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika as a unifying cultural narrative that frames religious diversity as a shared moral and social ideal. The significance of this study lies in its contribution to scholarship on religion and digital media by demonstrating how popular platforms function as sites of meaning production where religious identities and values are symbolically negotiated and normalized. By situating interfaith representation within the dynamics of popular digital discourse, this research offers insight into the role of media in shaping contemporary understandings of religious coexistence in multicultural societies.
References
Adan, M. Y. (2025). The role of peace education in promoting social justice and sustainable peace in post-conflict societies: A 4Rs framework analysis. 7, 1650027.
Alhouti, S., Bao, Y., & Zhang, S. (2025). Brand inclusivity in religion-based marketing: Roles of religiosity and diversity appreciation. https://www.emerald.com/jpbm/article/doi/10.1108/JPBM-06-2024-5279/1271134
Ankeny, R. A., & Leonelli, S. (2024). Investigating research practices: How qualitative methods enhance philosophical understandings of science. 11(2), 247.
Carradini, S., Gillings, M., & Marsen, S. (2025). Qualitative Methods in Business Communication: Interpreting the Language and Images of Business. International Journal of Business Communication, 62(4), 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884251362798
Cesari, J. (2025). The Future of Religious Freedom: Rights, Recognition, and Resistance in the 21st Century. Review of Faith and International Affairs, 23(4), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2025.2545127
Chen, Y. Y., & Hur, C. (2025). Exploring semiotic practices and cultural identity in a Bunun Indigenous elementary school in Taiwan from a barthesian perspective. Multicultural Education Review, 17(3), 272–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2025.2553990
Ding, Y., Xiao, Y., Jiang, Y., & Zhou, A. (2025). The mediatization of religion: How digital-age film and television reshape interfaith experiences. 16(9), 1172.
Donison, J. M. (2024). More than a Monolith: Podcasting Authentic Self-Concepts and Cultural Expressions in Canada. https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/items/f549fbab-1ae3-4e28-95b2-40fb9612e233
Gliniecka, M. (2023). The Ethics of Publicly Available Data Research: A Situated Ethics Framework for Reddit. Social Media + Society, 9(3), 20563051231192021. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231192021
Govers, J., Feldman, P., Dant, A., & Patros, P. (2023). Down the Rabbit Hole: Detecting Online Extremism, Radicalisation, and Politicised Hate Speech. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(14s), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3583067
Güleç, Y. (2026). Factors affecting religious tolerance and prejudice in school context: A mixed method research synthesis. British Journal of Religious Education, 48(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2025.2471100
Haq, S. U., & Kwok, R. Y. (2024). Encountering “the Other” in Religious Social Media: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Social Media + Society, 10(4), 20563051241303363. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241303363
Hermawan, W., Supriyadi, T., & Kurniawan, C. S. (2025). Designing a Pedagogical Model for Islamic Legal Literacy and Religious Moderation in Contemporary Digital Contexts. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 16(3), 209–237.
Hurley, Z., & Elyas, T. (2024). Soundscapes of the Adhan, the Islamic Call-to-Prayer: A Semiotic More-Than-Digital Analysis. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(3), 821–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00479-z
Indelicato, A., & Martín, J. C. (2025). Exploring the interplay between religion, tolerance, fundamentalism, and attitudes towards immigrants: A semi-automatic literature review. Social Identities, 31(3), 294–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2025.2453158
Krzyżanowski, M., & Ekström, M. (2022). The normalization of far-right populism and nativist authoritarianism: Discursive practices in media, journalism and the wider public sphere/s. Discourse & Society, 33(6), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221095406
Li, J., Adnan, H. M., & Gong, J. (2023). Exploring Cultural Meaning Construction in Social Media: An Analysis of Liziqi’s YouTube Channel. 23(4), 01–12.
Mahzumi, F., Aminuddin, A., Mahfudh, H., & Sm, M. M. (2025). CYBER-ISLAMIC MODERATION IN INDONESIA: Digital Activism of Islami.co and IBTimes.id and Its Implications for Young Muslims. Miqot: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 49(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v49i1.1290
Matos, L., Park, C. L., Indart, M. J., & Leal, I. (2024). “It’s the God factor”: A qualitative study of Syrian Muslims’ postwar religious meaning-making. 16(2), 163.
Megantari, K., Nugroho, H., & Arymami, D. (2025). Revealing The Indonesian Crazy Rich Prisoner on Social Media: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis. 30(3), 3342–3370.
Muzayanah, U., Maknun, M. L., Noviani, N. L., Muawanah, S., & Zakiyah. (2025). Utilization of Digital Space in Strengthening Religious Moderation Education of Generation Z in Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 33(2), 735–758. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.33.2.11
Nadeem, M., & Ali, F. (2025). Faith Under Fire: Online Hostility Toward Religious Minorities in Pakistan’s Digital News Spaces. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. https://doi.org/10.1111/sena.70002
Nee, R. C., & Santana, A. D. (2022). Podcasting the Pandemic: Exploring Storytelling Formats and Shifting Journalistic Norms in News Podcasts Related to the Coronavirus. Journalism Practice, 16(8), 1559–1577. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1882874
Nurhayati, L., Supriadi, U., Jenuri, J., & Karim, A. (2025). Integrating digital citizenship and religious moderation in open and distance education: A holistic approach to character development in Indonesia. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-02-2025-0025
Piper, I., Katnić, I., Orahovac, A., Gogić, A., & Mašković, M. (2025). Determinants of Tolerance Among Higher Education Students in Montenegro: Quantitative Insights for Advancing Educational and Societal Sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411109
Rohid, N., Sugihartati, R., Suyanto, B., Susilo, D., & Zikri, A. (2025). Digital Activism in Contemporary Islamic Politics: A Critical Analysis of Social Media’s Impact on Islamic Movements. 4(1), 208–232.
Schlunegger, M. C., Zumstein-Shaha, M., & Palm, R. (2024). Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 46(8), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241263011
Uso Domenech, J. L., Gash, H., Nescolarde-Selva, J. A., & Segura-Abad, L. (2024). Mythical systems: Sign and symbol. 53(10), 3401–3429.
Yeasmin, N., Heme, M. A., Mumu, M. N., Shovo, T.-E.-A., Aktar, R., Nizam, H., Hossain, M. T., & Shohel, T. A. (2024). A qualitative investigation to understand the challenges and representation of women in the media industry of Bangladesh. 10(9). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)06114-0
Yunus, F. M., Ikramatoun, S., Yasin, T. H. M., & Abror, R. H. (2025). REJECTION OF ROHINGYA IN ACEH: THE ROLE OF ULAMA AND TOLERANCE IN ACEHNESE SOCIETY. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 13(3), 1669–1692. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i3.1589
Zaluchu, S. E., Widodo, P., & Kriswanto, A. (2025). Conceptual reconstruction of religious moderation in the Indonesian context based on previous research: Bibliometric analysis. 11, 101552.
Zimmermann, B. M., Willem, T., Bredthauer, C. J., & Buyx, A. (2022). Ethical issues in social media recruitment for clinical studies: Ethical analysis and framework. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(5), e31231. https://doi.org/10.2196/31231
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Diva Raisa Zananda, Ade Masturi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jors( e-ISSN: 3123-3872 ) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with Jors agree to the following terms:
- The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA).
