Negotiating Mourning Norms: Living Fiqh of Ihdad among Widows in a Madurese Muslim Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/jors.v1i2.147Keywords:
Islamic law, living fiqh, Madurese culture, mourning practices, widowsAbstract
This study aims to examine how ihdad as an Islamic mourning obligation is understood, practiced, and negotiated in the everyday lives of widows within a Madurese Muslim community, where religious norms intersect with deeply rooted cultural expectations. Rather than treating ihdad as a fixed legal doctrine, the article explores its operation as a form of lived religious practice shaped by social pressure, economic necessity, religious literacy, and communal authority. Using a qualitative empirical legal approach, the research employs an in-depth case study conducted in a rural Madurese setting, drawing on semi-structured interviews with widows, religious leaders, and community figures, supported by participant observation and document analysis. The findings reveal that the implementation of ihdad is neither uniform nor purely doctrinal. While some widows adhere closely to classical fiqh prescriptions regarding duration, seclusion, and restrictions on adornment, others reinterpret or partially observe these norms due to livelihood demands, limited religious knowledge, or local customs. This variation illustrates the emergence of living fiqh, in which Islamic law is enacted through continuous negotiation between normative texts, cultural traditions, and social realities. Religious leaders and community norms play a decisive role in legitimizing particular interpretations, often prioritizing social harmony over strict legal formalism. The significance of this study lies in its contribution to socio-legal and religious studies by demonstrating how Islamic legal norms function as dynamic social practices rather than static rules. By foregrounding widows’ lived experiences, the article offers a nuanced understanding of how mourning, gender, and religious authority are negotiated in Muslim societies, thereby enriching broader discussions on religion, law, and social life within contemporary Muslim communities.
References
Ahmad, N., & Osman, Z. (2020). Religious knowledge and prosocial behavior among Muslim adolescents. Journal of Moral Education, 49(3), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1713894
Ali, H., & Salleh, S. (2022). Spiritual intelligence as a mediator between religious understanding and ethical conduct. International Journal of Ethics in Education, 28(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEE.2022.28.1.55
Al-Kandari, A. (2022). The impact of Quranic engagement on youth empathy and social behavior. Islamic Studies Review, 14(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/ISR.2022.142134
Azra, A. (2020). Islamic education and moral development in Indonesia. Asian Education Studies, 8(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n2p97
Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of moral agency. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 485–512. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033710
Bashir, M., Ahmed, R., & Tariq, S. (2022). Faith comprehension and ethical conformity among Pakistani students. International Journal of Youth Studies, 17(4), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/09733764221120985
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
Hassan, N., & Salleh, F. (2022). The influence of Islamic comprehension on adolescents’ moral behavior. Southeast Asian Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.7454/seajer.v13i1.2223
Hidayat, M., Fathurrahman, A., & Latifah, R. (2023). Religious comprehension and psychological well-being among Indonesian youth. Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.1910352
Khalid, A., & Ahmed, A. (2021). Faith, identity, and youth morality in Southeast Asia. Journal of Religion and Society, 23(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.22373/jrs.v23i1.2149
King, P., & Roeser, R. (2019). Moral and spiritual development in adolescence. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 485–509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103145
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Noor, M., & Hassan, S. (2021). Religious literacy and behavioral regulation among high school students. Asian Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(3), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/ajep.2021.230
Nurhayati, S. (2023). Religious instruction and moral internalization among Indonesian adolescents. Journal of Islamic Pedagogy, 5(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.18860/jip.v5i1.1936
Rahman, F., & Fadhil, A. (2020). Religion as a social integrator in multicultural Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Sociology, 16(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.7454/ijs.v16i2.88
Taufiq, N., & Latif, M. (2021). Critical interpretation skills and moral relativism among Muslim youth. International Journal of Comparative Education, 11(4), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/ijce.2021.300
Yusoff, N., & Rahman, H. (2021). Reflective religious education and sustainable moral awareness. Journal of Islamic Studies, 29(1), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etaa041
Zulkifli, R., Halim, A., & Karim, N. (2021). Moral reasoning through reflective Islamic learning. International Journal of Educational Studies, 15(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.233247
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Soim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jors( e-ISSN: 3123-3872 ) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with Jors agree to the following terms:
- The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA).