Interaction-Driven Reading Comprehension Development in EFL Classrooms: A Qualitative Study of Collaborative MeaningMaking in Secondary English Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/sshr.v2i1.197Keywords:
Interaction-Driven Learning, Reading Comprehension, EFL Classrooms, Collaborative Meaning-Making, Secondary English EducationAbstract
Background: Reading comprehension is a core component of EFL learning, yet many secondary classrooms still rely on teacher-centered instruction that limits interaction, engagement, and deeper interpretation of texts. Recent pedagogical perspectives suggest that collaborative classroom interaction can strengthen students’ comprehension and critical reading development.
Aims: This study investigates how interaction-driven instructional practices support reading comprehension development in EFL classrooms, with particular attention to collaborative meaning-making during reading activities.
Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was employed. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with teachers and students, and analysis of instructional documents. Participants were selected purposively based on their involvement in interactive reading instruction. The data were analyzed using thematic coding and interpretative analysis.
Results: The findings show that collaborative discussion and guided questioning increased student participation and supported deeper interpretation of texts. Students became more confident in expressing ideas and negotiating meaning with peers. Teachers also reported that interactive activities reduced reading anxiety and created a more supportive learning environment. However, differences in vocabulary mastery and learning motivation influenced the level of participation.
Conclusion: Interaction-driven pedagogy plays an important role in improving reading comprehension in EFL classrooms by promoting collaborative meaning-making, reflective engagement, and active participation. The study highlights the value of structured interaction and scaffolded discussion in creating more inclusive, meaningful, and pedagogically effective reading instruction in secondary English education.
References
Aalto, E., & Mustonen, S. (2022). Designing knowledge construction in pre-service teachers’ collaborative planning talk. Linguistics and Education, 69, 101022.
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., Ameen, B. M. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, 100198.
Al Baekani, A. K. (2025). COLLABORATIVE LEARNING & PEER INTERACTION IN ELT. DEEP LEARNING APPROACHES IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING: CULTIVATING CRITICAL AND CREATIVE LEARNERS, 165.
Ali, R., AbdAlgane, M., Youssif, E., Elkot, M. A., & Abbass, D. (2024). Elevating English reading comprehension: The synergy of dialogic teaching and technology integration in ESP learning environments. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(8), 1109–1118.
Aryal, S. (2024). Use and importance of qualitative research in school education. The Educator Journal, 12(1), 48–57.
Asti, A. A., & Rosalinah, Y. (2025). Collaborative Discussion in Vocabulary Learning through Short Stories. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(4), 401–421.
Brown, A., & Danaher, P. A. (2019). CHE Principles: Facilitating authentic and dialogical semi-structured interviews in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1379987
Chen, W., Hu, H., Lyu, Q., & Zheng, L. (2024). Using peer feedback to improve critical thinking in computer‐supported collaborative argumentation: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 3390–3405. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13078
Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G.-J., & Lin, C.-J. (2024). Integrating dialectical constructivist scaffolding-based argumentation mapping to support students’ dialectical thinking, oral and dialogical argumentation complexity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(6), 3241–3269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10395-5
Gasser, L., Dammert, Y., & Murphy, P. K. (2022). How Do Children Socially Learn from Narrative Fiction: Getting the Lesson, Simulating Social Worlds, or Dialogic Inquiry? Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1445–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09667-4
Hattan, C., Alexander, P. A., & Lupo, S. M. (2024). Leveraging What Students Know to Make Sense of Texts: What the Research Says About Prior Knowledge Activation. Review of Educational Research, 94(1), 73–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221148478
Hennessy, S., Calcagni, E., Leung, A., & Mercer, N. (2023). An analysis of the forms of teacher-student dialogue that are most productive for learning. Language and Education, 37(2), 186–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1956943
Iglesias-Diéguez, K., Martínez-Adrián, M., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2025). Peer-to-peer interaction in task-based learning and the development of young EFL learners’ productive vocabulary: An exploratory study. Language Awareness, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2025.2456754
Kelly, G. J. (2023). Qualitative research as culture and practice. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 60–86.
Khong, T. D. H., Saito, E., Hardy, I., & Gillies, R. (2023). Teacher learning through dialogue with colleagues, self and students. Educational Research, 65(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2023.2192226
Lesaux, N. K., Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). Investigating Cognitive and Linguistic Abilities that Influence the Reading Comprehension Skills of Children from Diverse Linguistic Backgrounds. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4713-6
Li, M., & Yuan, R. (2022). Enhancing students’ metacognitive development in higher education: A classroom-based inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101947.
Locke, K., Feldman, M., & Golden-Biddle, K. (2022). Coding Practices and Iterativity: Beyond Templates for Analyzing Qualitative Data. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120948600
Phillips, H. N. (2023). Developing critical thinking in classrooms: Teacher responses to a Reading-for-Meaning workshop. Reading & Writing, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v14i1.401
Rapanta, C., & Felton, M. K. (2022). Learning to Argue Through Dialogue: A Review of Instructional Approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2
Rojas-Drummond, S., Trigo-Clapés, A. L., Rubio-Jimenez, A. L., Hernández, J., & Márquez, A. M. (2024). Transforming dialogic teaching-and-learning practices in education. Theory Into Practice, 63(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2307839
Saepudin, S., Pabbajah, M. T. H., & Pabbajah, M. (2024). Unleashing the power of reading: Effective strategies for non-native Arabic language learners. Alsinatuna, 9(2), 116–138.
Sunan, M. A. D. U. (2024). Exploring Questioning Strategies in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension in Narrative Text. https://proceedings.uinsa.ac.id/index.php/ICONELT/article/view/3115
Tao, Y., Wang, D., & Chen, G. (2026). How does dialogic teaching facilitate students’ creative thinking? Evidence from a sequential analysis of teacher–student dialogue in primary language classrooms. British Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 776–805. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70031
Van Rijk, Y., Volman, M., De Haan, D., & Van Oers, B. (2017). Maximising meaning: Creating a learning environment for reading comprehension of informative texts from a Vygotskian perspective. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9218-5
Yang, L. (2023). An “Interactive Learning Model” to enhance EFL students’ lexical knowledge and reading comprehension. Sustainability, 15(8), 6471.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Raynesa Noor Emiliasari, Emi Emilia, Budi Hermawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.