Exploring Linguistic and Psychological Barriers to English Speaking Proficiency: A Qualitative Analysis of

Exploring Linguistic and Psychological Barriers to English Speaking Proficiency: A Qualitative Analysis of

Authors

  • Abu Hamid Muhammad Universitas Islam Negeri Prof. K. H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia
  • Muflihah Universitas Islam Negeri Prof. K. H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64780/sshr.v2i1.195

Keywords:

English Speaking Proficiency, Linguistic Barriers, Psychological Barriers, Junior High School Students, Pedagogical Implications

Abstract

Background: English speaking proficiency remains a significant challenge for junior high
school students in non-native English contexts. Many learners encounter both linguistic and
psychological barriers that limit their ability to communicate effectively. Although speaking
competence is essential for global communication and academic development, the underlying
factors influencing students’ speaking performance in Indonesian classrooms remain
insufficiently examined.
Aims: This study aims to identify the linguistic and psychological challenges that hinder junior
high school students’ English Speaking proficiency. In addition, it investigates how classroom
practices influence student participation and speaking performance in English learning
activities.
Methods: This research employed a qualitative descriptive design. Data were collected through
classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with students and teachers, and
documentation analysis. The participants were eighth-grade students at a junior high school in
Purwokerto, Indonesia. The collected data were analyzed using thematic coding to identify
recurring patterns related to speaking difficulties and classroom interaction.
Results: The findings reveal that students’ speaking difficulties are primarily associated with
limited vocabulary, pronunciation problems, anxiety, and low self-confidence. These linguistic
and psychological barriers reduce students’ willingness to participate in oral communication.
The study also shows that teacher-centered instructional practices tend to limit opportunities
for student interaction, which further constrains speaking development. Conversely, the use of
interactive classroom activities significantly increases students’ engagement and willingness to
speak.
Conclusion: The study concludes that improving English speaking proficiency requires
addressing both linguistic competence and students’ psychological readiness. Teachers should
adopt communicative teaching approaches, provide constructive feedback, and foster a
supportive classroom atmosphere. Increased opportunities for peer interaction and regular
speaking practice are essential for strengthening students’ confidence and participation in
English communication.

References

Abdelmageed, N. A. T., & Omer, M. A. A. (2020). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING APPROACH (CLT) IN DEVELOPING

STUDENTS’SPEAKING SKILLS FROM TEACHERS’PERCEPTIONS. European Journal of

English Language Teaching.

https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejel/article/view/3044

Ahsan, M., Asgher, T., & Hussain, Z. (2020). The effects of shyness and lack of confidence as

psychological barriers on EFL learners’ speaking skills: A case study of South Punjab.

Global Regional Review, 5(2), 109–119.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing

reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches.

Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47.

https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360

Carrion Zhunio, J. P., & Peñida Arias, J. D. (2022). Factors that influence the lack of english

speaking and pronunciation skills of EFL learners.

https://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/items/4ceda656-f77f-4e53-8b69-8b82a29db860

Chen, C.-H., Koong, C.-S., & Liao, C. (2022). Influences of integrating dynamic assessment into

a speech recognition learning design to support students’ English speaking skills,

learning anxiety and cognitive load. 25(1), 1–14.

Gobena, G. A. (2025). Psychological Barriers Contributing to Students’ Poor English

Language Speaking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 18(1), 273–290.

https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18115a

Henderson, H., da Silva, A. M., da Silva, M., Xavier, H. A. S., Mendonca, S. A., de Araújo, R. M.,

Vaughan, C., & Bohren, M. A. (2023). Body mapping as a participatory method to

explore health provider beliefs and understanding about sexual and reproductive health

and rights in Timor-Leste. 3, 100205.

Ismael, I., Li, S., & PHD. (2025). ORAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS AMONG EGYPTIAN EFL

UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: CHALLENGES, PSYCHOLOGICAL BARRIERS, AND

PEDAGOGICAL STRATEGIES. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied

Psychology, 32(S9 (2025): Posted 15 December), 1689–1705.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17940337

Jawaid, A., Batool, M., Arshad, W., Kaur, P., & ul Haq, M. I. (2024). English language

pronunciation challenges faced by tertiary students. Contemporary Journal of Social

Science Review, 2(04), 2104–2111.

Kahlke, R., Maggio, L. A., Lee, M. C., Cristancho, S., LaDonna, K., Abdallah, Z., Khehra, A.,

Kshatri, K., Horsley, T., & Varpio, L. (2025). When words fail us: An integrative review

of innovative elicitation techniques for qualitative interviews. Medical Education,

59(4), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15555

Khan, A. (2024). Student-Centered Learning: Enhancing Engagement Through Active

Teaching Strategies. Makran Journal of Educational Research, 1(01), 15–30.

Lee, G.-G., & Zhai, X. (2024). Using ChatGPT for science learning: A study on pre-service

teachers’ lesson planning. 17, 1643–1660.

Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian

Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Maher, K., & King, J. (2023). Language anxiety and learner silence in the classroom from a

cognitive-behavioral perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 105–111.

Melchor-Couto, S. (2017). Foreign language anxiety levels in Second Life oral interaction.

ReCALL, 29(1), 99–119.

Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher

education: The perceptions of teacher educators. 122, 103290.

Morgan, H. (2022). Understanding thematic analysis and the debates involving its use. 27(10),

2079–2090.

Mukhtarova, S. (2026). THE ROLE OF TEACHER-CENTERED AND STUDENT-CENTERED

APPROACHES IN EFFECTIVE TEACHING. ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И

ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 86(1), 63–69.

Rana, K., Poudel, P., & Chimoriya, R. (2023). Qualitative methodology in translational health

research: Current practices and future directions. 11(19), 2665.

Robillos, R. J. (2023). Improving students’ speaking performance and communication

engagement through technology-mediated pedagogical approach. International

Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 551–572.

Sulis, G. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of engagement in the language classroom: A critical

examination of methodological approaches. 3(3), 100162.

Tsang, A. (2025). The relationships between EFL learners’ anxiety in oral presentations, selfperceived pronunciation, and speaking proficiency. Language Teaching Research,

29(4), 1639–1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221102522

Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., Tiranant, P., Boonyakitanont, P., & Jinowat, N. (2024).

Designing chatbots in language classrooms: An empirical investigation from user

learning experience. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 32.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00319-4

Zega, Y. S. (2025).

Downloads

Published

2025-03-09

How to Cite

Muhammad, A. H. ., & Muflihah. (2025). Exploring Linguistic and Psychological Barriers to English Speaking Proficiency: A Qualitative Analysis of . Social Sciences and Humanities Reviews, 2(1), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.64780/sshr.v2i1.195
Loading...