Exploring Linguistic and Psychological Barriers to English Speaking Proficiency: A Qualitative Analysis of
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/sshr.v2i1.195Keywords:
English Speaking Proficiency, Linguistic Barriers, Psychological Barriers, Junior High School Students, Pedagogical ImplicationsAbstract
Background: English speaking proficiency remains a significant challenge for junior high
school students in non-native English contexts. Many learners encounter both linguistic and
psychological barriers that limit their ability to communicate effectively. Although speaking
competence is essential for global communication and academic development, the underlying
factors influencing students’ speaking performance in Indonesian classrooms remain
insufficiently examined.
Aims: This study aims to identify the linguistic and psychological challenges that hinder junior
high school students’ English Speaking proficiency. In addition, it investigates how classroom
practices influence student participation and speaking performance in English learning
activities.
Methods: This research employed a qualitative descriptive design. Data were collected through
classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with students and teachers, and
documentation analysis. The participants were eighth-grade students at a junior high school in
Purwokerto, Indonesia. The collected data were analyzed using thematic coding to identify
recurring patterns related to speaking difficulties and classroom interaction.
Results: The findings reveal that students’ speaking difficulties are primarily associated with
limited vocabulary, pronunciation problems, anxiety, and low self-confidence. These linguistic
and psychological barriers reduce students’ willingness to participate in oral communication.
The study also shows that teacher-centered instructional practices tend to limit opportunities
for student interaction, which further constrains speaking development. Conversely, the use of
interactive classroom activities significantly increases students’ engagement and willingness to
speak.
Conclusion: The study concludes that improving English speaking proficiency requires
addressing both linguistic competence and students’ psychological readiness. Teachers should
adopt communicative teaching approaches, provide constructive feedback, and foster a
supportive classroom atmosphere. Increased opportunities for peer interaction and regular
speaking practice are essential for strengthening students’ confidence and participation in
English communication.
References
Abdelmageed, N. A. T., & Omer, M. A. A. (2020). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING
COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING APPROACH (CLT) IN DEVELOPING
STUDENTS’SPEAKING SKILLS FROM TEACHERS’PERCEPTIONS. European Journal of
English Language Teaching.
https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejel/article/view/3044
Ahsan, M., Asgher, T., & Hussain, Z. (2020). The effects of shyness and lack of confidence as
psychological barriers on EFL learners’ speaking skills: A case study of South Punjab.
Global Regional Review, 5(2), 109–119.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing
reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches.
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47.
https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Carrion Zhunio, J. P., & Peñida Arias, J. D. (2022). Factors that influence the lack of english
speaking and pronunciation skills of EFL learners.
https://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/items/4ceda656-f77f-4e53-8b69-8b82a29db860
Chen, C.-H., Koong, C.-S., & Liao, C. (2022). Influences of integrating dynamic assessment into
a speech recognition learning design to support students’ English speaking skills,
learning anxiety and cognitive load. 25(1), 1–14.
Gobena, G. A. (2025). Psychological Barriers Contributing to Students’ Poor English
Language Speaking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 18(1), 273–290.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18115a
Henderson, H., da Silva, A. M., da Silva, M., Xavier, H. A. S., Mendonca, S. A., de Araújo, R. M.,
Vaughan, C., & Bohren, M. A. (2023). Body mapping as a participatory method to
explore health provider beliefs and understanding about sexual and reproductive health
and rights in Timor-Leste. 3, 100205.
Ismael, I., Li, S., & PHD. (2025). ORAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS AMONG EGYPTIAN EFL
UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: CHALLENGES, PSYCHOLOGICAL BARRIERS, AND
PEDAGOGICAL STRATEGIES. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied
Psychology, 32(S9 (2025): Posted 15 December), 1689–1705.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17940337
Jawaid, A., Batool, M., Arshad, W., Kaur, P., & ul Haq, M. I. (2024). English language
pronunciation challenges faced by tertiary students. Contemporary Journal of Social
Science Review, 2(04), 2104–2111.
Kahlke, R., Maggio, L. A., Lee, M. C., Cristancho, S., LaDonna, K., Abdallah, Z., Khehra, A.,
Kshatri, K., Horsley, T., & Varpio, L. (2025). When words fail us: An integrative review
of innovative elicitation techniques for qualitative interviews. Medical Education,
59(4), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15555
Khan, A. (2024). Student-Centered Learning: Enhancing Engagement Through Active
Teaching Strategies. Makran Journal of Educational Research, 1(01), 15–30.
Lee, G.-G., & Zhai, X. (2024). Using ChatGPT for science learning: A study on pre-service
teachers’ lesson planning. 17, 1643–1660.
Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian
Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Maher, K., & King, J. (2023). Language anxiety and learner silence in the classroom from a
cognitive-behavioral perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 105–111.
Melchor-Couto, S. (2017). Foreign language anxiety levels in Second Life oral interaction.
ReCALL, 29(1), 99–119.
Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher
education: The perceptions of teacher educators. 122, 103290.
Morgan, H. (2022). Understanding thematic analysis and the debates involving its use. 27(10),
2079–2090.
Mukhtarova, S. (2026). THE ROLE OF TEACHER-CENTERED AND STUDENT-CENTERED
APPROACHES IN EFFECTIVE TEACHING. ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И
ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 86(1), 63–69.
Rana, K., Poudel, P., & Chimoriya, R. (2023). Qualitative methodology in translational health
research: Current practices and future directions. 11(19), 2665.
Robillos, R. J. (2023). Improving students’ speaking performance and communication
engagement through technology-mediated pedagogical approach. International
Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 551–572.
Sulis, G. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of engagement in the language classroom: A critical
examination of methodological approaches. 3(3), 100162.
Tsang, A. (2025). The relationships between EFL learners’ anxiety in oral presentations, selfperceived pronunciation, and speaking proficiency. Language Teaching Research,
29(4), 1639–1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221102522
Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., Tiranant, P., Boonyakitanont, P., & Jinowat, N. (2024).
Designing chatbots in language classrooms: An empirical investigation from user
learning experience. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 32.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00319-4
Zega, Y. S. (2025).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abu Hamid Muhammad, Muflihah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.