Translating Curriculum Reform into Classroom Practice: A Qualitative Evaluation of the Merdeka Curriculum in English Language Teaching Using the CIPP Framework.

Translating Curriculum Reform into Classroom Practice: A Qualitative Evaluation of the Merdeka Curriculum in English Language Teaching Using the CIPP Framework.

Authors

  • Andi Husni A. Zainuddin Universitas Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia
  • Sahraini Universitas Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia
  • Magfirah Thayyib Universitas Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64780/sshr.v2i1.194

Keywords:

Merdeka Curriculum, curriculum implementation, English language teaching, CIPP evaluation model, curriculum reform, qualitative educational research

Abstract

Background: Curriculum reform has become an important strategy for improving educational quality and promoting student-centered learning in many education systems. In Indonesia, the Merdeka Curriculum was introduced to provide greater flexibility in teaching, encourage learner autonomy, and strengthen twenty-first-century competencies such as collaboration, communication, and critical thinking. However, translating curriculum policy into effective classroom practice remains challenging, particularly in English language teaching where pedagogical approaches, assessment practices, and learning resources must adjust to new instructional orientations.

Aims: This study aims to evaluate how the Merdeka Curriculum is implemented in English language classrooms using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation framework.

Method: The research employed a qualitative design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with English teachers, classroom observations, and analysis of instructional documents related to curriculum implementation. Participants were selected purposively based on their involvement in applying the Merdeka Curriculum. The data were analyzed thematically according to the four dimensions of the CIPP model.

Result: The findings indicate that the Merdeka Curriculum aligns conceptually with national education policies and institutional goals. Nevertheless, contextual adaptation remains limited, teacher training often emphasizes policy understanding rather than pedagogical application, and unequal digital resources influence instructional effectiveness. Classroom observations also reveal that teacher-centered practices still partially persist.

Conclusion: The study concludes that successful curriculum reform requires sustained teacher professional development that prioritizes practical pedagogical transformation. Stronger institutional support, contextual adaptation, and equitable learning resources are essential to ensure that the principles of the Merdeka Curriculum can be translated into meaningful and student-centered classroom practices.

References

Caley, L., Williams, S. J., Spernaes, I., Thomas, D., Behrens, D., & Willson, A. (2021). Frameworks for evaluating education programmes and work related learning: A scoping review. Journal of Workplace Learning, 33(6), 486–501.

Dahal, N., Neupane, B. P., Pant, B. P., Dhakal, R. K., Giri, D. R., Ghimire, P. R., & Bhandari, L. P. (2024). Participant selection procedures in qualitative research: Experiences and some points for consideration. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 9, 1512747.

Dimmock, C., Tan, C. Y., Nguyen, D., Tran, T. A., & Dinh, T. T. (2021). Implementing education system reform: Local adaptation in school reform of teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 80, 102302.

Dizon, A. G. (2023). Historical development of CIPP as a curriculum evaluation model. History of Education, 52(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2022.2098390

Gopinathan, S., Kaur, A. H., Veeraya, S., & Raman, M. (2022). The role of digital collaboration in student engagement towards enhancing student participation during COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(11), 6844.

Gouëdard, P., Pont, B., Hyttinen, S., & Huang, P. (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2020/12/curriculum-reform_16f39dcc/efe8a48c-en.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Gregory, E. (2020). Methodological challenges for the qualitative researcher: The use of a conceptual framework within a qualitative case study. London Review of Education, 18(1), 126–141.

Hatch, J. A. (2023). Doing qualitative research in education settings. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5976793&publisher=FZT373

Juan, W., Mukhtar, M. I., & Nasir, N. I. (2024). Exploring the Quality of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Teaching at China Higher Education Institutions Using Stufflebeams’s Cipp Model: A Case Study. International Journal of Creative Future and Heritage (TENIAT), 12(2), 81–101.

Kiugu, K. D. D., Kibaara, T., & Wachira, R. (2021). Examination of the adequacy of resources preparedness for implementation of integration of digital learning in public primary schools in Meru County, Kenya. J. Educ. Pract, 7, 50–76.

Lakew, B. M., Yigzaw Filatie, A., & Simegn Chanie, B. (2025). Exploring innovative pedagogical approaches: Primary school EFL teachers’ utilization of teaching strategies. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2510030. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2510030

Leko, M. M., Cook, B. G., & Cook, L. (2021). Qualitative Methods in Special Education Research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(4), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12268

Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Manan, S. A., Channa, L. A., David, M. K., & Amin, M. (2021). Negotiating English-only gatekeepers: Teachers’ agency through a public sphere lens. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(3), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1839219

Ogwudile, C. L. (2025a). STUFFLEBEAM’S CIPP MODEL OF EVALUATION. Irish International Journal of Engineering and Scientific Studies, 8(5), 1–24.

Ogwudile, C. L. (2025b). STUFFLEBEAM’S CIPP MODEL OF EVALUATION. Irish International Journal of Engineering and Scientific Studies, 8(5), 1–24.

Park, E., Ifenthaler, D., & Clariana, R. B. (2023). Adaptive or adapted to: Sequence and reflexive thematic analysis to understand learners’ self-regulated learning in an adaptive learning analytics dashboard. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 98–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13287

Peña, H., & Galigao, R. P. (2024). Bridging the divide: An analysis of demand and supply of education resources in various countries around the world. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4), 165–181.

Poulton, P. (2020). Teacher agency in curriculum reform: The role of assessment in enabling and constraining primary teachers’ agency. Curriculum Perspectives, 40(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-020-00100-w

Ratnay, G., Indriaswuri, R., Widayanthi, D. G. C., Atmaja, I., & Dalem, A. A. (2022). CIPP Evaluation Model for Vocational Education: A Critical Review. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(3), 1–8.

Sierra-Piedrahita, A. M., & Echeverri-Sucerquia, P. A. (2020). Governmental professional development initiatives for the implementation of language policies and curriculum guidelines: Secondary school teachers’ experiences, challenges and views. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 25(1), 137–152.

Sol, T., Ledezma, C., Sánchez, A., & Font, V. (2025). Teachers’ Practical Argumentation on the Teaching of the Pythagorean Theorem. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(8), 3707–3731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10591-6

Swain, J., & King, B. (2022). Using Informal Conversations in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221085056. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221085056

Wu, Y. J., & Chen, J.-C. (2021). Stimulating innovation with an innovative curriculum: A curriculum design for a course on new product development. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100561.

Zeng, L. M. (2020). Peer review of teaching in higher education: A systematic review of its impact on the professional development of university teachers from the teaching expertise perspective. Educational Research Review, 31, 100333.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-09

How to Cite

A. Zainuddin, A. H., Sahraini, & Thayyib, M. (2026). Translating Curriculum Reform into Classroom Practice: A Qualitative Evaluation of the Merdeka Curriculum in English Language Teaching Using the CIPP Framework. Social Sciences and Humanities Reviews, 2(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.64780/sshr.v2i1.194
Loading...