Enhancing Elementary Students' Problem-Solving Skills in Geometry Through Schema-Based Instruction: A Classroom Action Research Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/jole.v1i2.70Keywords:
Elementary Education, Flat Shapes, Problem-Solving Skills, Schema-Based Instruction, Visual Learning StrategyAbstract
Background: Mathematics plays a critical role in nurturing students' logical reasoning and problem-solving capabilities, especially in geometry, which often poses challenges for elementary learners. Previous observations at SD Djama’atul Ichwan Surakarta revealed that third-grade students struggled to understand the concept of flat shapes (plane geometry) and to apply relevant strategies in solving word problems. This deficiency highlighted the need for an instructional approach that bridges conceptual gaps and enhances problem-solving proficiency.
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Schema-Based Instruction (SBI) in improving elementary students' problem-solving skills in geometry, specifically in the context of flat shape word problems.
Methods: The research employed a classroom action research (CAR) design conducted over two cycles. The participants were 31 third-grade students from SD Djama’atul Ichwan during the 2018/2019 academic year. Data were collected using tests, observations, interviews, and documentation. Triangulation techniques and Miles-Huberman’s interactive model were used for data analysis to ensure validity and depth.
Results: Findings showed a significant improvement in students' problem-solving skills. Initial classical mastery was only 10%, which increased to 87% by the end of Cycle I and exceeded the 80% research target in Cycle II, with final meetings reaching up to 94% classical mastery.
Conclusion: The implementation of Schema-Based Instruction significantly enhanced students’ ability to solve geometry word problems. By guiding learners through structured schemata, SBI enabled better comprehension, strategic organization of information, and accurate solution processes. Its visual and stepwise nature aligns with the cognitive characteristics of elementary students, especially at the concrete operational stage. The results underscore SBI's potential as an effective pedagogical tool in primary mathematics education. Moreover, this study contributes to instructional design literature by validating SBI as a contextually adaptable and scalable strategy for fostering mathematical thinking. Future research could explore its long-term impact and application across broader mathematical domains.
References
Bae, H., & Kwon, K. (2021). Developing metacognitive skills through class activities: What makes students use metacognitive skills? Educational Studies, 47(4), 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1707068
Barbieri, C. A., & Rodrigues, J. (2025). Leveraging cognitive load theory to support students with mathematics difficulty. Educational Psychologist, 60(3), 208–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2025.2486138
Burns, S., Saleem, S., McMullen, E., Falenchuk, O., White, L., Dhuey, E., & Perlman, M. (2025). A systematic review and meta‐analysis of approaches to teaching problem‐solving skills in early childhood education and care settings: A focus on science, technology, engineering and mathematics activities. Review of Education, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70079
Byrne, E. M., Jensen, H., Thomsen, B. S., & Ramchandani, P. G. (2023). Educational interventions involving physical manipulatives for improving children’s learning and development: A scoping review. Review of Education, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3400
Clayback, K. A., Williford, A. P., & Vitiello, V. E. (2023). Identifying Teacher Beliefs and Experiences Associated with Curriculum Implementation Fidelity in Early Childhood Education. Prevention Science, 24(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01414-z
Dorel, L. (2023). The relationship between visual and abstract comprehension in spatial geometry, and its importance to developing spatial perception and vision. 30(4), 219–226.
Du Plooy, E., Casteleijn, D., & Franzsen, D. (2024). Personalized adaptive learning in higher education: A scoping review of key characteristics and impact on academic performance and engagement. 10(21). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)15661-7
Jung, E., Lim, R., & Kim, D. (2022). A schema-based instructional design model for self-paced learning environments. 12(4), 271.
Laseinde, O. T., & Dada, D. (2024). Enhancing teaching and learning in STEM Labs: The development of an android-based virtual reality platform. 105, 240–246.
Lee, I.-J., & Chen, C.-M. (2025). Using asymmetric AR and VR technologies combined with peer collaboration and symbolic play to enhance intent understanding and empathy in children with autism. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2483416
Lin, X., & Powell, S. R. (2022). The Roles of Initial Mathematics, Reading, and Cognitive Skills in Subsequent Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Review of Educational Research, 92(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211054576
Lu, H. S., & Daugherty, A. (2022). Key factors for improving rigor and reproducibility: Guidelines, peer reviews, and journal technical reviews. 9, 856102.
Martadi, M., & Sampurno, M. B. T. (2025). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy through Banyuwangi Artsin Elementary Education. 25(1), 44–58.
Mehta, P. (2021). Teachers’ readiness to adopt online teaching amid COVID-19 lockdown and perceived stress: Pain or panacea? 21(6), 1229–1249.
Nadzri, A. Y. N. M., Ayub, A. F. M., & Zulkifli, N. N. (2023). The effect of using augmented reality module in learning geometry on mathematics performance among primary students. 3, 4.
Ng, O.-L., & Ye, H. (2022). Mathematics learning as embodied making: Primary students’ investigation of 3D geometry with handheld 3D printing technology. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(2), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09755-8
Quent, J. A., Greve, A., & Henson, R. N. (2022). Shape of U: The Nonmonotonic Relationship Between Object–Location Memory and Expectedness. Psychological Science, 33(12), 2084–2097. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221109134
Scippo, S., Madiai, S., & Cuomo, S. (2025). Digital Tessellation for Geometry Learning in Primary School: A Quasi-Experimental Study. 24, 1–31.
Sidik, G. S., Antiya, T., Zahrah, R. F., Apriani, I. F., & Salimi, M. (2025). What Are the Learning Obstacles in Students’ Algebraic Thinking During the Introduction of Plane Geometry Material? Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia, 5. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251160
Supli, A. A., & Yan, X. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of augmented reality in enhancing spatial reasoning skills: A study on mental rotation, spatial orientation, and spatial visualization in primary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12255-w
Tsinganos, N., Fouliras, P., Mavridis, I., & Gritzalis, D. (2024). Cse-ars: Deep learning-based late fusion of multimodal information for chat-based social engineering attack recognition. 12, 16072–16088.
Vicente, S., Verschaffel, L., Sánchez, R., & Múñez, D. (2022). Arithmetic word problem solving. Analysis of Singaporean and Spanish textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111(3), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10169-x
Yalley, E., Armah, G., & Ansah, R. K. (2021). Effect of the VAN Hiele Instructional Model on Students’ Achievement in Geometry. Education Research International, 2021, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6993668
Yu, K. Y., Goo, D. Y., & Lee, I. H. (2025). Research on the extrusion characteristics for the geometry of materials in material extrusion process using heating syringe. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88512-4
Zheng, J., Qiu, S., Shi, C., & Ma, Q. (2025). Towards Lifelong Learning of Large Language Models: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(8), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3716629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 muhammad syarif syarif, Hadi , Riyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.