Structured School Discipline as a Cultural Practice: A Qualitative Case Study on Character Formation in Secondary Education

Structured School Discipline as a Cultural Practice: A Qualitative Case Study on Character Formation in Secondary Education

Authors

  • Maria Editha Bela Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Citra Bakti, Indonesia
  • Yohanes Oskarito Kila Kel Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Citra Bakti, Indonesia
  • Yosefa Vilmit Ndao Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Citra Bakti, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64780/jole.v1i4.188

Keywords:

Character Formation, Qualitative Case Study, School Culture, School Discipline, Secondary Education;

Abstract

Background: School discipline is often reduced to compliance with rules, even though in practice it can become a shared routine that shapes how students learn to act and relate. How structured discipline works as a cultural practice that supports character formation in secondary schooling still needs closer qualitative attention.

Aims: This study examines how structured school discipline is enacted as a cultural practice and how it is linked to students’ character formation in a secondary education setting.

Methods: Using a qualitative case study design, data were gathered through direct observations of daily school routines, semi structured interviews with teachers and students, and review of relevant school documents. The analysis followed a descriptive qualitative approach to identify recurring patterns across sources and connect disciplinary practices with character related outcomes.

Result: Discipline was experienced as a daily cultural pattern supported by leadership and teacher role modelling, strict time regulation, routine checks of uniform and preparedness, regular evaluation meetings, extracurricular participation, and recognition for achievement. These practices were associated with students becoming more organized, accountable, and better able to manage time and tasks, alongside improved self regulation and cooperative behaviour. Challenges included student resistance to rules perceived as overly strict and occasional inconsistencies in enforcement.

Conclusion: Structured discipline can function as a cultural practice that strengthens character formation when it is modelled, communicated, and applied consistently. Sustaining its benefits requires continual reflection through evaluation and coordinated support among school staff, students, and parents.

References

Abbas, A., Ekowati, D., Suhariadi, F., & Anwar, A. (2024). Human Capital Creation: A Collective Psychological, Social, Organizational and Religious Perspective. Journal of Religion and Health, 63(3), 2168–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01665-8

Alsharif, R. S. (2025). Hyperbole in Arabic YouTube: A pragmalinguistic study of artificial intelligence discourse. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1085. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05215-x

Bernardi della Rosa, S., & Zengiaro, N. (2025). The Biosemiotic Glossary Project: Habit. Biosemiotics, 18(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-025-09594-1

Blanco, I., Lowndes, V., & Salazar, Y. (2022). Understanding institutional dynamics in participatory governance: How rules, practices and narratives combine to produce stability or diverge to create conditions for change. Critical Policy Studies, 16(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.1984265

Brook, O., & Cseres, K. J. (2024). Priority Setting as the Blind Spot of Administrative Law Enforcement: A Theoretical, Conceptual, and Empirical Study of Competition Authorities in Europe. The Modern Law Review, 87(5), 1209–1257. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12881

Carless, D., To, J., Kwan, C., & Kwok, J. (2023). Disciplinary perspectives on feedback processes: Towards signature feedback practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1158–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863355

Carter, D. P., & Siddiki, S. (2021). Participation rationales, regulatory enforcement, and compliance motivations in a voluntary program context. Regulation & Governance, 15(2), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12289

Cedergren, A., & Hassel, H. (2024). Building organizational adaptive capacity in the face of crisis: Lessons from a public sector case study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 100, 104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104235

Cui, R., & Teo, P. (2021). Dialogic education for classroom teaching: A critical review. Language and Education, 35(3), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1837859

Docherty, N. (2021). Digital self-control and the neoliberalization of social media well-being. International Journal of Communication, 15, 3827–3846.

Dyar, K. L. (2022). Qualitative inquiry in nursing: Creating rigor. Nursing Forum, 57(1), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12661

Elmesky, R., & Marcucci, O. (2023). Beyond Cultural Mismatch Theories: The Role of Antiblackness in School Discipline and Social Control Practices. American Educational Research Journal, 60(4), 769–809. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312231175858

Emerson, A., & Costley, D. (2023). A Scoping Review of School-Based Strategies for Addressing Anxiety, Intolerance of Uncertainty and Prediction in Autistic Pupils. Education Sciences, 13(6), 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060575

Hasan, Moh. F. (2025). Educational authority and regulatory legitimacy: Comparing normative systems in pesantren and public schools in Indonesia. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 57(2–3), 182–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2025.2556586

Hindriks, F. (2022). Institutions and their strength. Economics & Philosophy, 38(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267121000195

Huang, Y., Jiang, L., & Zhai, R. (2025). Reconciling Teaching and Research Tensions: A Sustainability Framework for Expert Teacher Development in Research Intensive Universities. Sustainability, 17(15), 7113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157113

Jarl, M., Andersson, K., & Blossing, U. (2021). Organizational characteristics of successful and failing schools: A theoretical framework for explaining variation in student achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1903941

Jayawardena, N. S. (2021). The role of culture in student discipline of secondary schools in cross-cultural context: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(6), 1099–1123. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2020-0325

Kawai, T. (2021). A Theoretical Framework on Reflection in Service Learning: Deepening Reflection Through Identity Development. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.604997

Koretsky, M. D., Vauras, M., Jones, C., Iiskala, T., & Volet, S. (2021). Productive Disciplinary Engagement in High- and Low-Outcome Student Groups: Observations From Three Collaborative Science Learning Contexts. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9838-8

Kremser, W., & Blagoev, B. (2021). The Dynamics of Prioritizing: How Actors Temporally Pattern Complex Role–Routine Ecologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2), 339–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220948483

Kvangraven, I. H. (2021). Beyond the Stereotype: Restating the Relevance of the Dependency Research Programme. Development and Change, 52(1), 76–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12593

Leggat, F. J., Wadey, R., Day, M. C., Winter, S., & Sanders, P. (2023). Bridging the Know-Do Gap Using Integrated Knowledge Translation and Qualitative Inquiry: A Narrative Review. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15(2), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2021.1954074

Lepak, N., Newingham, B. A., Kachergis, E., Toledo, David, & Moffitt, J. (2022). Where do qualitative assessments fit in an era of increasingly quantitative monitoring? Perspectives from Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health. Rangelands, Adaptive Monitoring to Support Adaptive Management, 44(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2021.07.008

Lovren, V. O., & Jablanovic, M. M. (2023). Bridging the Gap: The Affective Dimension of Learning Outcomes in Environmental Primary and Secondary Education. Sustainability, 15(8), 6370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086370

Macagno, T., Nguyen-Quoc, A., & Jarvis, S. P. (2024). Nurturing Sustainability Changemakers through Transformative Learning Using Design Thinking: Evidence from an Exploratory Qualitative Study. Sustainability, 16(3), 1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031243

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

Mincu, M. (2022). Why is school leadership key to transforming education? Structural and cultural assumptions for quality education in diverse contexts. PROSPECTS, 52(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09625-6

Mullen, C. A., & Klimaitis, C. C. (2021). Defining mentoring: A literature review of issues, types, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1483(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14176

Muñiz, J. O. (2021). Exclusionary Discipline Policies, School-Police Partnerships, Surveillance Technologies and Disproportionality: A Review of the School to Prison Pipeline Literature. The Urban Review, 53(5), 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-021-00595-1

Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G. W.-H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Capatina, A., Chakraborty, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Huang, T.-L., Kar, A. K., Lee, V.-H., Loh, X.-M., Micu, A., Mikalef, P., Mogaji, E., Pandey, N., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., Sarker, P., Sharma, A., … Wong, L.-W. (2025). The Potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence Across Disciplines: Perspectives and Future Directions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 65(1), 76–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2261010

Plaku, A. K., & Leka, K. (2025). The role of leaders in shaping school culture. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541525

Posselt, J. R., & Nuñez, A.-M. (2022). Learning in the Wild: Fieldwork, Gender, and the Social Construction of Disciplinary Culture. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(2), 163–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1971505

Ro’is, I., Huzaini, M., & Jufri, A. (2025). Fairness, Greenwashing, and Religious Centrality: Explaining Muslim Tourists’ Conservation Payment Intentions in a UNESCO Geopark. Tourism and Hospitality, 6(5), 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6050224

Schwittay, A. (2025). Teaching critical hope with creative pedagogies of possibilities. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 33(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2187439

Smolentseva, A. (2023). The contributions of higher education to society: A conceptual approach. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2130230

Steyn, F., & Sewchurran, K. (2021). Towards a Grainier Understanding of How to Encourage Morally Responsible Leadership Through the Development of Phronesis: A Typology of Managerial Phronesis. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(4), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04328-z

Stutchbury, K. (2022). Critical realism: An explanatory framework for small-scale qualitative studies or an ‘unhelpful edifice’? International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1966623

Szafran, D., & Bach, R. L. (2024). “The Human Must Remain the Central Focus”: Subjective Fairness Perceptions in Automated Decision-Making. Minds and Machines, 34(3), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09684-y

Taylor, J.-P., Zuber, M., & Shoup, D. (2023). Determinants of School Discipline: Examination of Institutional Level Factors Impacting Exclusionary Sanctions. Youth & Society, 55(3), 581–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X221075053

Torres, L. L. (2022). School Organizational Culture and Leadership: Theoretical Trends and New Analytical Proposals. Education Sciences, 12(4), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040254

Usher, M., & Barak, M. (2024). Unpacking the role of AI ethics online education for science and engineering students. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00493-4

Walker, A., & Qian, H. (2022). Developing a model of instructional leadership in China. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 52(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1747396

Welsh, R. O. (2024). Administering Discipline: An Examination of the Factors Shaping School Discipline Practices. Education and Urban Society, 56(7), 847–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245231208170

Zarestky, J., Bigler, M., Brazile, M., Lopes, T., & Bangerth, W. (2022). Reflective Writing Supports Metacognition and Self-regulation in Graduate Computational Science and Engineering. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100085

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

Bela, M. E., Kila Kel, Y. O., & Ndao, Y. V. (2025). Structured School Discipline as a Cultural Practice: A Qualitative Case Study on Character Formation in Secondary Education. Journal of Literacy Education, 1(4), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.64780/jole.v1i4.188
Loading...