Beyond Procedural Correctness: Legal Formalism and the Search for Justice in Indonesian Criminal Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/rolsj.v1i4.168Keywords:
Indonesian criminal law; , legal formalism; , procedural correctness; , restorative justice; , substantive justice;Abstract
Abstrak
Background: Indonesian criminal law enforcement frequently privileges procedural accuracy as the clearest sign of justice. Yet decisions that satisfy formal requirements may still be experienced as unfair when they disregard social context and the substance of harm.
Aims: This article explores how a procedure-centered mindset narrows the meaning of justice in Indonesian criminal law and considers how restorative justice can help broaden justice beyond a strictly formal reading of legality.
Methods: The study uses normative legal research with a conceptual and analytical design. Statutory provisions, doctrinal reasoning, and key scholarly debates are examined through close legal interpretation and critical assessment to map the effects of formalism and to situate restorative justice as a justice-oriented framework.
Result: The analysis indicates that an overreliance on procedural correctness can turn criminal law into an exercise in compliance, where legality is treated as an endpoint rather than a means to achieve fairness. In this setting, the interests of victims, offenders, and communities risk being handled in a fragmented way, because the process is valued more than the repair of harm. Read as a framework rather than a mere policy tool, restorative justice offers a way to reconnect accountability with relationships, context, and proportional outcomes.
Conclusion: The article argues that justice in Indonesian criminal law cannot be exhausted by procedural validity alone. A more adequate approach requires interpretation that is attentive to social realities, with restorative justice functioning as a conceptual bridge toward substantive justice.
References
Bublitz, J. C. (2024). When is Disbelief Epistemic Injustice? Criminal Procedure, Recovered Memories, and Deformations of the Epistemic Subject. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 18(3), 681–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-023-09695-3
Butler, A., Zakimi, N., & Greer, A. (2022). Total systems failure: Police officers’ perspectives on the impacts of the justice, health, and social service systems on people who use drugs. Harm Reduction Journal, 19(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00629-1
Carlsson, V. (2025). Legal certainty in automated decision-making in welfare services. Public Policy and Administration, 40(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231202334
Demarest, M. T. (2021). Procedural (in)justice, emotions, and compliance. Sociology Compass, 15(11), e12936. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12936
Faisal, Yanto, A., Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., Darmawan, A., & Manik, J. D. N. (2024). Genuine paradigm of criminal justice: Rethinking penal reform within Indonesia New Criminal Code. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2301634. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2301634
Jeßberger, F., & Steinl, L. (2022). Strategic Litigation in International Criminal Justice: Facilitating a View from Within. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 20(2), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqac008
Kirkwood, S. (2022). A practice framework for restorative justice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 63, 101688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101688
Kuemlangan, B., Amidjogbe, E.-R., Nakamura, J., Tomassi, A., Hupperts, R., Bojang, B., & Amador, T. (2023). Enforcement approaches against illegal fishing in national fisheries legislation. Marine Policy, 149, 105514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105514
Legg, C., & Reynolds, J. (2022). Habits of Mind. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XIV(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.2994
Lenta, P. (2023). Amnesties, Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 15(3), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-023-00199-9
Luichies, I., Goossensen, A., & der Meide, H. van. (2021). Caregiving for ageing parents: A literature review on the experience of adult children. Nursing Ethics, 28(6), 844–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019881713
Maslen, H., & Paine, C. (2024). Ethical Resource Allocation in Policing: Why Policing Requires a Different Approach from Healthcare. Criminal Justice Ethics, 43(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2024.2327819
McAuliffe, P. (2021). Transitional Justice, Institutions and Temporality: Towards a Dynamic Understanding. International Criminal Law Review, 21(5), 817–847. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10060
Miller, C. M. (2022). A survey of prosecutors and investigators using digital evidence: A starting point. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 6, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100296
Mpofu, Z. F., Mkhize, S. M., & Akpan, J. U. (2024). Empathy, remorse, and restoration of dignity contributing to reduced recidivism: Assessing the role of restorative justice in promoting offender rehabilitation and reintegration in Durban. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2429018. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2429018
Munandar, M. I., & Newton, J. (2021). Indonesian EFL teachers’ pedagogic beliefs and classroom practices regarding culture and interculturality. Language and Intercultural Communication, 21(2), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1867155
O’Donohue, W., & Fisher, J. E. (2023). Accusation Is Not Proof: Procedural Justice in Psychology. Clinical Psychological Science, 11(4), 705–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026231159564
Okpala, C. O. R., & Korzeniowska, M. (2023). Understanding the Relevance of Quality Management in Agro-food Product Industry: From Ethical Considerations to Assuring Food Hygiene Quality Safety Standards and Its Associated Processes. Food Reviews International, 39(4), 1879–1952. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2021.1938600
Preuß, K. (2023). ‘Legal Formalism’ and Western legal thought*. Jurisprudence, 14(1), 22–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2022.2112457
Ricca, M. (2023). How to Undo (and Redo) Words with Facts: A Semio-enactivist Approach to Law, Space and Experience. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 36(1), 313–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09912-7
Riswandi, B. A., Alfaqiih, A., & Wicaksono, L. S. (2023). Design of Equity Crowdfunding in the Digital Age. Laws, 12(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12010008
Rogers, A. A., Ha, T., & Ockey, S. (2021). Adolescents’ Perceived Socio-Emotional Impact of COVID-19 and Implications for Mental Health: Results From a U.S.-Based Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.039
Roy, S. (2021). Theory of Social Proof and Legal Compliance: A Socio-Cognitive Explanation for Regulatory (Non) Compliance. German Law Journal, 22(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.5
Schultz, W. J., Bucerius, S. M., & Haggerty, K. D. (2021). The Floating Signifier of “Radicalization”: Correctional Officers’ Perceptions of Prison Radicalization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(6), 828–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820969749
Sukirman, & Kabilan, M. K. (2023). Indonesian researchers’ scholarly publishing: An activity theory perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(8), 2030–2047. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2209522
Ta, T., Geron, T., Levinson, M., & Bogia, M. (2023). “The power of open dialogue”: Using normative case studies to facilitate ethical dilemmas discussions among school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104237
Widjajanto, A., Astawa, I. G. P., & Rulyandi, M. (2025). Decolonising restorative justice in Indonesia: A comparative study across Customary Law traditions. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(2), 470–492. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i2.40481
Windsor, L. C., Benoit, E., Lee, C., Jemal, A., Kugler, K., Smith, D. C., Pinto, R. M., & Musaad, S. (2024). Critical Dialogue and Capacity-Building Projects Reduced Alcohol and Substance Use in a Randomized Clinical Trial Among Formerly Incarcerated Men. Substance Use & Misuse, 59(11), 1574–1585. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2352611
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Luthfia Rahmadani, Wahidin Wahidin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.