Teacher Competence and Student Learning Outcomes: A Correlational Study in Primary Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/jole.v1i3.88Keywords:
Correlational study, Pedagogy, Primary education, Student learning outcomes, Teacher competenceAbstract
Background: Teacher competence has long been recognized as a critical determinant of educational quality and student success. In many primary education settings, limitations in pedagogical skills, professional attitudes, and classroom management continue to hinder optimal learning outcomes. Understanding the direct relationship between teacher competence and student achievement is essential for strengthening the evidence base that informs teacher training and educational policy.
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the effect of teacher competence—encompassing pedagogical, professional, social, and personal dimensions—on the learning outcomes of primary school students.
Methods: The research employed a quantitative correlational design involving 49 participants, including classroom teachers and students from grade IV and V of a primary school. Data were collected through structured questionnaires, classroom observation, and documentation. The analysis utilized the Pearson Product Moment correlation to examine the strength and significance of the relationship between teacher competence and student learning outcomes.
Results: Findings revealed a statistically significant correlation between teacher competence and student learning outcomes (r = 0.651, p < 0.05). The results confirmed that improvements in teachers’ pedagogical practices, professional responsibility, and classroom interaction were positively associated with higher student achievement scores.
Conclusion: This study highlights the central role of teacher competence in shaping student learning outcomes in primary education. Strengthening teacher capacities through professional development, pedagogical training, and reflective practice is essential for achieving sustainable improvements in student performance. The evidence supports the need for education stakeholders to prioritize competence-based teacher training programs as a strategic policy intervention. While the study was conducted in a single school context, its implications extend broadly to similar educational systems, particularly in developing regions. Future research should explore longitudinal and multi-site analyses to provide deeper insights into how teacher competence interacts with contextual factors such as curriculum, resources, and socio-cultural environments.
References
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
Alam, T. M., Stoica, G. A., & Özgöbek, Ö. (2025). Asking the classroom with technology: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00348-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00348-z
Alcocer, I., Lima, H., Sugai, L. S. M., & Llusia, D. (2022). Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: A meta‐analysis. Biological Reviews, 97(6), 2209–2236. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12890
Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Defining teaching quality around the world. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080
Deng, Y., & Liu, H. (2025). To overcome test anxiety in on-line assessment: Unpacking the mediator roles of techno competencies, teacher support, self-efficacy, and autonomy. BMC Psychology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02545-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02545-y
Foster, C. (2024). Methodological pragmatism in educational research: From qualitative-quantitative to exploratory-confirmatory distinctions. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 47(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2210063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2210063
Foxton, R., San Diego, J. P., Lu, E., Rajadurai, S., Bartlett, A., McIlwane, C., Austin, R., Srisontisuk, P., Sagoo, A. K., & Piper, K. (2025). Scaffolding competence-based learning design in the dental simulation curriculum. European Journal of Dental Education, 29(3), 516–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12985 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12985
Guo, L., & Wang, J. (2021). Relationships between teacher autonomy, collaboration, and critical thinking focused instruction: A cross-national study. 106, 101730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101730
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Hidayat, C., Lengkana, A. S., Rohyana, A., Purwanto, D., & Rosalina, M. (2023). Motivating Active Learning in Physical Education: Critical Thinking. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(2). https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=21658714&AN=164363880&h=k3iSVe5PRVFSsdazweNIkTp59NjrFExoamZjFsQ7C5J9S602FvznZCA5oEakC7dJhLtoWFIBbA%2Bm7oE9WEibQQ%3D%3D&crl=c
Izah, S. C., Sylva, L., & Hait, M. (2023). Cronbach’s Alpha: A Cornerstone in Ensuring Reliability and Validity in Environmental Health Assessment. ES Energy & Environment, Volume 23 (March 2024)(0), 1057. https://doi.org/10.30919/esee1057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30919/esee1057
Jones, L., Barnett, A., & Vagenas, D. (2025). Common misconceptions held by health researchers when interpreting linear regression assumptions, a cross-sectional study. 20(6), e0299617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299617
Kiani, A. K., Pheby, D., Henehan, G., Brown, R., Sieving, P., Sykora, P., Marks, R., Falsini, B., Capodicasa, N., & Miertus, S. (2022). Ethical considerations regarding animal experimentation. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 63(2 Suppl 3), E255.
Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. 15(7), 5614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075614
Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. 8(1), 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267
Li, Y., & Song, G. (2025). An Operational Risk Prediction Method for Corporate Financial Management Based on Big Data Analysis. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129156425403420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129156425403420
Lozano-Pena, G., Saez-Delgado, F., Lopez-Angulo, Y., & Mella-Norambuena, J. (2021). Teachers’ social–emotional competence: History, concept, models, instruments, and recommendations for educational quality. Sustainability, 13(21), 12142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112142
Mosia, M., Egara, F. O., Nannim, F. A., & Basitere, M. (2025). Factors influencing students’ performance in university mathematics courses: A structural equation modelling approach. 15(2), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020188
Øvrebø, L. J., Dyrstad, D. N., Hansen, B. S., & Johansen, E. A. (2025). The balancing act of competence assessment in placement: Postgraduate critical care nursing students’ and preceptors’ experiences. A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104464
Safwan, S., Shaheen, F. A., Zaidi, S. J. A., & Siddiqui, S. (2025). Exploring determinants of teacher performance in karachi’s private secondary schools: The roles of subject mastery, organizational leadership, experience, and communication skills. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00682-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00682-5
Shaaban, T. S., & Mohamed, A. M. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of augmented reality technology on reading comprehension skills among early childhood pupils with learning disabilities. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00269-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00269-9
Shang, Y., Cao, K.-F., Yue, J.-Y., Zhao, S.-Z., Hao, S.-H., Sun, Y.-Z., Cui, Q.-Y., Guo, H.-M., & Tang, C.-H. (2025). Comparative effectiveness of various teaching modes, including PBL, CBL, and CTTM in paediatric medical education with combined online and offline approaches. BMC Medical Education, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06267-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06267-4
Shen, J., & Wu, H. (2025). The Relationship Between Principal Leadership and Student Achievement: A Multivariate Meta-Analysis with an Emphasis on Conceptual Models and Methodological Approaches. Educational Administration Quarterly, 61(2), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X241286527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X241286527
Shin, D. D., Park, S., Kim, J. A., Nagengast, B., & Bong, M. (2025). Examining how teachers’ characteristics impact student motivation and achievement across subject, school level, gender, and prior achievement level. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10104-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10104-x
Stantcheva, S. (2023). How to Run Surveys: A Guide to Creating Your Own Identifying Variation and Revealing the Invisible. Annual Review of Economics, 15(1), 205–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-091622-010157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-091622-010157
Tao, Y., Meng, Y., Gao, Z., & Yang, X. (2022). Perceived teacher support, student engagement, and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology, 42(4), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2033168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2033168
Tynyskhanova, A., Yessenova, K., Xoldarova, I., Ismailova, F., & Zhunusbekova, A. (2025). Work-integrated curriculum transformation and autopedagogical competence in prospective teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(4), 3273–3282. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i4.33746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i4.33746
Vogl, P., Methlagl, M., & Hanfstingl, B. (2025). A systematic review of strategies, contexts and outcomes of emotion regulation in teaching. Discover Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00417-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00417-5
Wijaya, T. T., Cao, Y., & Habibi, A. (2024). Critical factors affecting the participation of mathematics teachers in professional development training. Current Psychology, 43(43), 33180–33195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06850-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06850-4
Zancajo, A., Fontdevila, C., Verger, A., & Bonal, X. (2021). Regulating public-private partnerships, governing non-state schools: An equity perspective: Background paper for UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/257845
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mardiana, Roslenv, Muliani Azis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.