Democracy and the Political Rights of Former Prisoners in Indonesia: A Legal Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/rolsj.v1i3.93Keywords:
Candidacy Eligibility, Constitutional Law , Ex-prisoners’ Tights, Local ElectionsAbstract
Background; Debate persists over whether former prisoners may stand in Indonesia’s local elections; Constitutional Court Decision No. 42/PUU-XIII/2015 reshapes the line between electoral integrity and rights protection.
Aims; To unpack the Court’s reasoning and assess how it protects ex-prisoners’ political rights while maintaining the credibility of local democratic contests.
Methods; Normative juridical study employing doctrinal analysis of the 1945 Constitution, pertinent statutes, and Decision No. 42/PUU-XIII/2015, read alongside scholarly commentary and case-based interpretation.
Result; The Court positions political participation as a basic right that cannot be curtailed arbitrarily, yet allows narrowly tailored, proportionate limits to deter abuse and uphold ethical governance. The ruling refines candidacy criteria, improves legal certainty, and aligns practice with justice, proportionality, and inclusive democracy.
Conclusion; By recognizing conditional eligibility for ex-prisoners, the Court advances democratic inclusion without diluting electoral standards, offering a pragmatic constitutional pathway for balancing rights and good governance in Indonesia’s local elections.
References
Agustyati, K., Pratama, H., Birnir, J. K., Overos, H., Okthariza, N., Kholidin, I., Ramadhanil, F., & Savirani, A. (2025). Indonesia Election Archive: Institutions, candidates and results. Scientific Data, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05746-7
Ali, T. O., Hassan, M., & Hossain, N. (2021). The moral and political economy of the pandemic in Bangladesh: Weak states and strong societies during Covid-19. World Development, 137, 105216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105216
Babagbeto, G. M., & Ezin, E. C. (2026). Designing an e-Voting System Based on Blockchain and Smart Contracts in Developing Countries. Lect. Notes Inst. Comput. Sci. Soc. Informatics Telecommun. Eng., 618 LNICST, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93557-2_12
Beazer, Q. H., & Reuter, O. J. (2022). Do Authoritarian Elections Help the Poor? Evidence from Russian Cities. The Journal of Politics, 84(1), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1086/714775
Berryessa, C. M. (2022). Modeling “Remorse Bias” in probation narratives: Examining social cognition and judgments of implicit violence during sentencing. Journal of Social Issues, 78(2), 452–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12508
Bhat, M. M. A. (2021). Governing Democracy Outside the Law: India’s Election Commission and the Challenge of Accountability. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 16(S1), S85–S104. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2021.30
Bhatt, B. (2022). Ethical complexity of social change: Negotiated actions of a social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 177(4), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05100-6
Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., Bratianu, C., Martínez-Martínez, A., Vătămănescu, E.-M., & Dabija, D.-C. (2023). Creating civic and public engagement by a proper balance between emotional, rational, and spiritual knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(8), 2113–2135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2022-0532
Chen, H., Tang, S., Wu, D., & Yang, D. (2021). The Political Dynamics of Corporate Tax Avoidance: The Chinese Experience. The Accounting Review, 96(5), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2017-0601
Dichter, T. A. (2021). Worst of the Worst: Rehabilitationist Roots of Life without Parole. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 17(3), 529–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872117733190
Doerfler, R. D. (2023). How Clear Is ?clear?? Virginia Law Review, 109(3), 651–710.
Gehrke, M., & Yang, F. (2025). High-Profile Corruption Convictions, Government Reactions, and Public Approval: A Comparative Analysis Across Levels of Democracy. Governance, 38(3), e70019. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70019
Ghandour, A., Woodford, B. J., & Abusaimeh, H. (2024). Ethical Considerations in the Use of ChatGPT: An Exploration Through the Lens of Five Moral Dimensions. IEEE Access, 12, 60682–60693. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3394243
Haley, M. D. (2022). Unequal Treatment: (In)compassionate Release from Federal Prison in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Vaccine. Columbia Law Review, 122(7), 1997–2032.
Hall, A. B., & Yoder, J. (2022). Does Homeownership Influence Political Behavior? Evidence from Administrative Data. The Journal of Politics, 84(1), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1086/714932
Hansen, E. K. S. (2022). Students’ agency, creative reasoning, and collaboration in mathematical problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00365-y
Hlavacik, M., & Krutka, D. G. (2021). Deliberation can wait: How civic litigation makes inquiry critical. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(3), 418–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1933665
Jamaluddine, Z., Abukmail, H., Aly, S., Campbell, O. M. R., & Checchi, F. (2025). Traumatic injury mortality in the Gaza Strip from Oct 7, 2023, to June 30, 2024: A capture–recapture analysis. The Lancet, 405(10477), 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02678-3
Jimoh, A. L., Abdulrasaq, S., & Olawale, YA. (2024). Perceived corruption and political trust: The role of social media use. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 19(1), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-06-2024-0142
Kerr, N., & Wahman, M. (2021). Electoral Rulings and Public Trust in African Courts and Elections. Comparative Politics, 53(2), 257–290. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041521X15930293747844
Kristjánsson, K., Fowers, B., Darnell, C., & Pollard, D. (2021). Phronesis (Practical Wisdom) as a Type of Contextual Integrative Thinking. Review of General Psychology, 25(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211023063
Kruse, S. D. (2022). Department chair leadership: Exploring the role’s demands and tensions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(5), 739–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220953601
Kusdarini, E., Priyanto, A., Hartini, S., & Suripno, S. (2022). Roles of justice courts: Settlement of general election administrative disputes in Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11932
Lucero, E., Robles, R., Trounstine, J., & Collins, J. (2025). What Date Works Best for You? Changes in Electorate Demographics and Policy Priorities in Concurrent Elections. Urban Affairs Review, 61(4), 1243–1269. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874241297100
McKay, L., Jennings, W., & Stoker, G. (2021). Political Trust in the “Places That Don’t Matter.” Frontiers in Political Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.642236
Mpofu, Z. F., Mkhize, S. M., & Akpan, J. U. (2024). Empathy, remorse, and restoration of dignity contributing to reduced recidivism: Assessing the role of restorative justice in promoting offender rehabilitation and reintegration in Durban. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2429018. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2429018
Murray, B. M. (2021). Retributive Expungement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 169(3), 665–716.
Nabiebu, M. (2022). Nigeria’s Legal Regulatory Framework for Ensuring a Credible 2023 Election. International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS), 1(3), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.59683/ijls.v1i3.32
Piazza, K., & Landy, J. (2025). Captain Mayor and Sergeant Councilman? An Assessment of the Reach of Military Politicization in Brazilian Politics. Armed Forces and Society, 51(4), 1185–1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X241255652
Roberts, P. (2021). Presumptuous or pluralistic presumptions of innocence? Methodological diagnosis towards conceptual reinvigoration. Synthese, 198(9), 8901–8932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02606-2
Rosenzweig, S. C. (2025). Partisan Law Enforcement and Extremist Violence: Evidence from U.S. Sheriffs. Political Research Quarterly, 78(3), 972–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129251334100
Shukla, A., Clithero-Eridon, A., Crandall, C., Chartash, D., Mahan, R., & Albright, D. (2025). A Snapshot of Family Medicine Physician Engagement with State Policy: Findings from the 2023 CERA Survey. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 38(3), 610–618. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240414R1
Simon, J. (2025). Dignity Defied: Legal-Rational Myths and the Surplus Legitimacy of the Carceral State. Law & Social Inquiry, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2024.40
Stenderup, R., & Pedersen, M. J. (2025). Compliance burden versus program integrity protection: A survey experiment on citizen attitudes toward administrative documentation requirements in public service policy. Public Administration Review, 85(5), 1512–1527. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13919
Stevens, M., Rawat, S., & Satterfield, T. (2025). Care, conflict, and coexistence: Human–wildlife relations in community forests. People and Nature, 7(1), 231–246. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10760
Straus, G. (2025). The Economic Background of City Councilmembers. Urban Affairs Review, 61(5), 1551–1568. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251315148
Susser, D., & Cabrera, L. Y. (2024). Brain Data in Context: Are New Rights the Way to Mental and Brain Privacy? AJOB Neuroscience, 15(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2023.2188275
Verhoef, A. H., & Coetser, Y. M. (n.d.). Academic integrity of university students during emergency remote online assessment: An exploration of student voices. Transformation in Higher Education, 6(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v6i0.132
Zhang, C., Tao, R., & Su, F. (2025). Legislative decentralization and regulatory dilution: Evidence from air pollution control in China. World Development, 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107002
Zulhadi, Al Firdaus, L. K., Fitriyah, & Kushandjani. (2025). Post-Disaster Aid in Electoral Contexts: The Intersection of Insurance Law and Economic Justice. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 8(2), 416–449. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v8i2.131865
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alfian Widyatama, Isharyanto Isharyanto, Andriana Firdausy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.