A Legal Review of Standardized Loan Contracts in Cooperatives: Case Study from the District Court of Kediri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/rolsj.v1i1.36Keywords:
Consumer Protection Law, Contractual Balance, Cooperative Loan Agreement, Legal Validity, Standard ClauseAbstract
Background: Standardized loan agreements are commonly used in cooperatives, but often raise concerns about fairness due to the unequal bargaining position of borrowers. When such contracts are imposed unilaterally, they may contradict principles of consumer protection and contract justice.
Aims: This study examines the legal validity of standardized clauses in cooperative loan agreements and evaluates whether such contracts comply with the principle of balance. It also reviews a relevant court decision from the District Court of Kediri.
Methods: The research adopts a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. Legal data were analyzed through deductive reasoning supported by Indonesian civil law, consumer protection law, and cooperative regulations.
Result: Findings show that the clauses in question did not qualify as prohibited exoneration clauses under the Consumer Protection Law. The cooperative’s contract fulfilled the formal legal requirements under the Civil Code, and the court upheld its validity, despite the standard nature of the terms.
Conclusion: Standard loan agreements in cooperatives are generally considered valid by Indonesian courts, provided they meet formal legal standards. However, to ensure fairness, legal safeguards and better regulatory oversight are needed to protect weaker parties in such contractual relationships.
References
Adamyk, B., Benson, V., Adamyk, O., & Liashenko, O. (2025). Risk Management in DeFi: Analyses of the Innovative Tools and Platforms for Tracking DeFi Transactions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18010038
Armaly, M. T. (2021). Loyalty over Fairness: Acceptance of Unfair Supreme Court Procedures. Political Research Quarterly, 74(4), 927–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920944470
Benseghir, M., & Bendriss, H. (2025). The Consumer’s Right to Withdraw from Blockchain Smart Contracts Challenges and Solutions. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 234, 673–683. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84636-6_59
Biewer, S., Baum, K., Sterz, S., Hermanns, H., Hetmank, S., Langer, M., Lauber-Rönsberg, A., & Lehr, F. (2024). Software doping analysis for human oversight. Formal Methods in System Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10703-024-00445-2
Blunden, C. (2022). Between Market Failures and Justice Failures: Trade-Offs Between Efficiency and Equality in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(3), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04767-7
Busch, M., Mühlrath, D., & Herzig, C. (2023). Fairness and trust in organic food supply chains. British Food Journal, 126(2), 864–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2023-0394
Clarke, J., Allan Fels, A. O., Fisse, B., Healey, D., Marquis, M., Middleton, J. E., & Smith, R. L. (2025). Competition Law and Economics in Australia Volume I: The Competition Law System: Context, Law, and Economics (Vol. 1, p. 397). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003509028
de Oliveira, A. (2025). Navigating the labour law challenges and implications for digital influencers in Brazil: A call for enhanced regulatory practices. In The Hashtag Hustle: Law and Policy Perspectives on Working in the Influencer Economy (pp. 171–188). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035332816.00017
Foran, M. (2022). THE CORNERSTONE OF OUR LAW: EQUALITY, CONSISTENCY AND JUDICIAL REVIEW. The Cambridge Law Journal, 81(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819732200023X
Garz, S., Giné, X., Karlan, D., Mazer, R., Sanford, C., & Zinman, J. (2021). Consumer Protection for Financial Inclusion in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Bridging Regulator and Academic Perspectives. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 13(Volume 13, 2021), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-071020-012008
Green, B. (2022). The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms. Computer Law & Security Review, 45, 105681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105681
Gritsenko, D., & Wood, M. (2022). Algorithmic governance: A modes of governance approach. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12367
Gupta, A., Bajpai, A., & Sivaraman, J. (2025). Consumer ADR in India. In Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution in Emerging Economies (pp. 154–169). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032689739-11
Hardy, T., & McCrystal, S. (2022). The importance of competition and consumer law in regulating gig work and beyond. Journal of Industrial Relations, 64(5), 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856211068868
Harjono, D. K. (2023). STANDARD AGREEMENTS IN THE CONCEPT OF FREEDOM OF CONTRACT. Russian Law Journal, 11(3), Article 3.
Hasanah, U., Djulaeka, D., Zaman, N., Rusdiana, E., & Driss, B. (2025). The Indonesian Consumer Protection Law for Credit Union Depositors in Credit Union Failures: Quo Vadis? Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 8(1), 108–133. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v8i1.12415
Hayati, A. N. (2025). The Issue of Dark Patterns in Digital Platforms: The Challenge for Indonesia’s Consumer Protection Law. Asian Journal of Law and Society. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2024.24
Haykal, H., Negoro, T., & Adeline, L. (2021). Revitalization of Funding for Savings and Loans Cooperatives As Efforts To Improve The State’s Economy After The Covid-19 Pandemic. Yustisia, 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v10i2.50438
Kapiriri, L., & Razavi, S. D. (2022). Equity, justice, and social values in priority setting: A qualitative study of resource allocation criteria for global donor organizations working in low-income countries. International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01565-5
Kaya, S., & Sahin-Sengül, E. (2025). Consumer ADR in Turkey. In Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution in Emerging Economies (pp. 40–53). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032689739-4
Khan, M. D. (2025). Consumer ADR in Pakistan. In Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution in Emerging Economies (pp. 233–248). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032689739-16
Khanderia, S. (2025). Beyond borders: Unravelling the territorial scope of consumer protection laws in India. Indian Law Review. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2025.2497006
Lannon, C., Nelson, J., & Cunneen, M. (2021). Ethical AI for Automated Bus Lane Enforcement. Sustainability, 13(21), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111579
Losos, E. C., Pfaff, A., & Pimm, S. L. (2024). Tackling debt, biodiversity loss, and climate change. Science, 384(6696), 618–621. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado7418
Lu, Y. (2025). Consumer ADR in China. In Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution in Emerging Economies (pp. 91–107). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032689739-7
Meehan, J., & Pinnington, B. D. (2021). Modern slavery in supply chains: Insights through strategic ambiguity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-05-2020-0292
Mercurio, B., & Upreti, P. N. (2022). From Necessity to Flexibility: A Reflection on the Negotiations for a TRIPS Waiver for Covid-19 Vaccines and Treatments. World Trade Review, 21(5), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745622000283
Mitsilegas, V. (2021). European prosecution between cooperation and integration: The European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the rule of law. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 28(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X211005933
Nofrial, R., Abood, T. A., Shihab, H. A., & Susilo, A. B. (2025). The Consumer Protection in The Balance of Business Actors and Consumers: A Paradigm of Justice. Jurnal Hukum Unissula, 41(1), 72–90. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v41i1.43967
Novkovic, S., Puusa, A., & Miner, K. (2022). Co-operative identity and the dual nature: From paradox to complementarities. Journal of Co-Operative Organization and Management, 10(1), 100162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2021.100162
Petročnik, T. (2025). Content creators and digital platforms: The potential of selected EU frameworks to address the issues of digital labour beyond platform work. In The Hashtag Hustle: Law and Policy Perspectives on Working in the Influencer Economy (pp. 189–209). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035332816.00018
Ragab, M. A., & Marzouk, M. (2021). BIM Adoption in Construction Contracts: Content Analysis Approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(8), 04021094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002123
Rahajeng, D. K. (2022). The ethical paradox in Islamic cooperatives: A lesson learned from scandalous fraud cases in Indonesia’s Baitul Maal Wat Tamwil. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2090208. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2090208
Rojak, J. A., Luthfy, R. M., & Jati, S. P. (2025). Integrating Consumer Protection Law and Halal Certification into Efficient Logistics: The Role of Packaging, Price, and Social Media in Halal Product Distribution. Journal of Distribution Science, 23(1), 95–111. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.23.01.202501.95
Rosidah, Z. N., & Karjoko, L. (2025). Enhancing Consumer Protection in Electronic Transactions in Indonesia. Sriwijaya Law Review, 9(1), 194–207. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3942.pp194-207
Sacchetti, S., & Tortia, E. C. (2020). Governing cooperatives in the context of individual motives. International Journal of Social Economics, 48(2), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-09-2019-0579
Sciortino, C., Sgroi, F., & Napoli, S. (2025). Greenwashing in the agri-food industry: A discussion around EU policies and the Italian. Food and Humanity, 4. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100528
Scott-Ngoepe, T. (2025). Liability for Damage Caused by Loadshedding: A Consideration of Whether Collective Action for Redress by Consumers in South Africa is Possible. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 28. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17159//1727-3781/2025/v28i0a17933
Simoncini, M. (2021). Challenges of Justice in the European Banking Union: Administrative Integration and Mismatches in Jurisdiction. Yearbook of European Law, 40, 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yeab001
Singh, B., Kaunert, C., Lal, S., Arora, M. K., & Wongmahesak, K. (2025). Advocating consumer protection in the age of green washing: Promoting sustainable development through a judicial lens. In Adaptive Strategies for Green Economy and Sustainability Policies (pp. 163–182). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7570-9.ch011
Tarekegne, B., & Sidortsov, R. (2021). Evaluating sub-Saharan Africa’s electrification progress: Guiding principles for pro-poor strategies. Energy Research & Social Science, 75, 102045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102045
Tilton, E. C. R., & Ichikawa, J. J. (2021). Not What I Agreed To: Content and Consent. Ethics, 132(1), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1086/715283
van den Boom, J. (2023). What does the Digital Markets Act harmonize? – Exploring interactions between the DMA and national competition laws. European Competition Journal, 19(1), 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2022.2156728
Verdier, D. (2022). Bargaining strategies for governance complex games. The Review of International Organizations, 17(2), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-020-09407-9
Wang, Y., Liu, H., & Fang, J. (2022). Mitigating risk perception in imbalanced supply chain relationships: Roles of contract framing and IT integration. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 122(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2022-0041
Xiao, L. Y. (2025). Illegal loot box advertising on social media? An empirical study using the Meta and TikTok ad transparency repositories. Computer Law and Security Review, 56. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106069
Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712
Zdraveva, N. (2025). ADR for Consumer Disputes in the Consumer Protection Legislation of North Macedonia. European Union and Its Neighbours in a Globalized World, 20, 257–271. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76345-8_16
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-05-25 (2)
- 2025-05-25 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rokhmatun Hanifah, Adi Sulistiyono Sulistiyono, Pranoto Pranoto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.