Recognizing Indigenous Legal Standing in Forest Administration: Advancing Sustainable Management of Customary Forests in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/rolsj.v1i1.32Keywords:
Citizen Participation, Customary Forests, Indigenous Peoples, Legal Recognition, Sustainable Forest ManagementAbstract
Background: Although the Constitutional Court of Indonesia ruled in Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012 that customary forests are no longer categorized as state forests, the absence of a specific law recognizing indigenous legal status continues to create legal ambiguity. This regulatory gap weakens the legal protection of indigenous peoples and affects the sustainability of forest management practices rooted in traditional knowledge and land stewardship.
Aims: This study seeks to explore two key objectives: first, to evaluate the necessity of passing the Indigenous Peoples Bill as a legislative instrument to secure indigenous forest rights; second, to investigate the significance of indigenous community engagement in promoting long-term, sustainable management of customary forests.
Methods: Using a doctrinal legal research approach, the study is guided by the sociological jurisprudence framework and Arnstein’s Ladder of Citizen Participation theory. The analysis incorporates qualitative case references from multiple regions across Indonesia, including Java, Kalimantan, Sumatra, Sulawesi, and Papua, offering a diverse perspective on customary forest governance.
Result: The research highlights ongoing inconsistencies in the legal framework that restrict indigenous authority over ancestral forests. In many regions, participation by indigenous communities remains limited to consultative levels, failing to reach the stages of power-sharing or partnership. Regions with greater community involvement tend to exhibit stronger outcomes in forest preservation and ecological balance.
Conclusion: There is an urgent need for formal legal recognition of indigenous peoples through the ratification of the Indigenous Peoples Bill. Strengthening indigenous participation and legal empowerment is essential to ensuring justice, environmental resilience, and the harmonization of customary practices with national forest governance policies.
References
Affandi, O., Kartodihardjo, H., Nugroho, B., & Ekawati, S. (2021). Institutional analysis of forest governance after the implementation of Law Number 23/2014 in North Sumatra Province, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.8755
Aggarwal, S., Larson, A., McDermott, C., Katila, P., & Giessen, L. (2021). Tenure reform for better forestry: An unfinished policy agenda. Forest Policy and Economics, 123. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102376
Arizona, Y., Wicaksono, M. T., & Vel, J. (2019). The Role of Indigeneity NGOs in the Legal Recognition of Adat Communities and Customary Forests in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 487–506. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670241
Bezerra, A. J. S., da Silva, E. V., & Oliveira, M. M. (2023). Vegetation diversity of species in the percepyion of farmers and Community members of the Araripe-CE bioregion. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Fisica, 16(2), 765–780. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v16.2.p765-780
Browne, K., Banerjea, N., McGlynn, N., Bakshi, L., Beethi, S., & Biswas, R. (2021). The limits of legislative change: Moving beyond inclusion/exclusion to create ‘a life worth living.’ Environment and Planning C, 39(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419845910
Buckel, S., Pichl, M., & Vestena, C. A. (2024). Legal Struggles: A Social Theory Perspective on Strategic Litigation and Legal Mobilisation. Social & Legal Studies, 33(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639231153783
Budiman, M. A. K., & Oue, H. (2025). Integrating Indigenous Knowledge into Sustainable Forest Management for Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies: Case from Southern Slopes of Mount Slamet, Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 31(1), 41–60. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.31.1.41
Cotroneo, S. M., Jacobo, Elizabeth Juliana, & and Brassiolo, M. M. (2021). Degradation processes and adaptive strategies in communal forests of Argentine dry Chaco. Integrating stakeholder knowledge and perceptions. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1972042
Criado, J. I., & and Villodre, J. (2021). Delivering public services through social media in European local governments. An interpretative framework using semantic algorithms. Local Government Studies, 47(2), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1729750
Csurgó, B., & Smith, M. K. (2021). The value of cultural ecosystem services in a rural landscape context. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.030
Dewey, M., & Di Carlo, D. (2022). Governing through non-enforcement: Regulatory forbearance as industrial policy in advanced economies. Regulation & Governance, 16(3), 930–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12382
Díaz, A. F., del Pilar Moreno Badajoz, R., & Rivero Borrell, L. E. Z. (2021). Self-government in Cherán K’eri and territorial defense. Revista d’Estudis Autonomics i Federals, 34, 205–232. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.8080.01.73
Greenaway, A., Macbride-Stewart, S., Grant, A., Finlay-Smits, S., Ayala, M., Allen, W., O’brien, L., & Martin, M. (2023). Positioning Research to Improve Tree-Biosecurity Relations. Knowledge Cultures, 11(1), 234–259. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22381/kc111202312
Gupta, D., Sinha, M., & Chhatre, A. (2022). India’s Forest Rights Act and indigenous claims to community forest resources: A case study of Lavari, Maharashtra. World Development Perspectives, 27. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100449
Guttmann, A. (2021). Commons and cooperatives: A new governance of collective action. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 92(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12291
Harada, K., Habib, M., Sakata, Y., & Maryudi, A. (2022). The role of NGOs in recognition and sustainable maintenance of customary forests within indigenous communities: The case of Kerinci, Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 113, 105865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105865
Helberger, N., Sax, M., Strycharz, J., & Micklitz, H.-W. (2022). Choice Architectures in the Digital Economy: Towards a New Understanding of Digital Vulnerability. Journal of Consumer Policy, 45(2), 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-021-09500-5
Hidayat, R., Nugroho, I., Zainuddin, Z., & Ingai, T. A. (2023). A systematic review of analytical thinking skills in STEM education settings. Information and Learning Sciences, 125(7/8), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2023-0070
Hu, Y., & Lin, Y. (2022). Comparison of green building policies and regulations between central and local governments of China: Analysis based on text similarity. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1064852
Kelemen, R. D., & Pavone, T. (2023). Where Have the Guardians Gone? Law Enforcement and the Politics of Supranational Forbearance in the European Union. World Politics, 75(4), 779–825.
Kurniasih, H., Ford, R. M., Keenan, R. J., & King, B. (2021). The evolution of community forestry through the growth of interlinked community institutions in Java, Indonesia. World Development, 139, 105319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105319
Liu, H., Zhou, R., Yao, P., & Zhang, J. (2023). Assessing Chinese governance low-carbon economic peer effects in local government and under sustainable environmental regulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(22), 61304–61323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17901-9
Lund, C. (2023). An air of legality – legalization under conditions of rightlessness in Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 50(4), 1295–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2096448
Mahaseth, H., Shukla, A., & Dhande, H. (2023). The Religious Forests of Nepal and India: A Need for Concern? International Forestry Review, 25(3), 327–334. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554823837586249
Mainville, S., & Joynt, C. (2025). Empowering Indigenous peoples as the architects of their law and jurisdiction: A critical analysis of UNDRIP implementation and legislative reconciliation in Canada. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/11926422.2025.2500923
Mayastuti, A., & Purwadi, H. (2025). Legal protection for indigenous women as a basis for climate resilience of indigenous peoples in Indonesia. 1462(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1462/1/012057
Mokski, E., Filho, W. L., Sehnem, S., & Guerra, J. B. S. O. de A. (2022). Education for sustainable development in higher education institutions: An approach for effective interdisciplinarity. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(1), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2021-0306
Niedziałkowski, K., & Chmielewski, P. (2023). Challenging the dominant path of forest policy? Bottom-up, citizen forest management initiatives in a top-down governance context in Poland. Forest Policy and Economics, 154, 103009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103009
Notess, L., Veit, P., Monterroso, I., Andiko, Sulle, E., Larson, A. M., Gindroz, A.-S., Quaedvlieg, J., & Williams, A. (2021). Community land formalization and company land acquisition procedures: A review of 33 procedures in 15 countries. Land Use Policy, 110, 104461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104461
Peay, P. C. (2021). Incorporation is Not Enough: The Agenda Influence of Black Lawmakers in Congressional Committees. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 6(2), 402–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2020.18
Peek, L., & Guikema, S. (2021). Interdisciplinary Theory, Methods, and Approaches for Hazards and Disaster Research: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Risk Analysis, 41(7), 1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13777
Piazza, A. (2021). Collective Responsibility in the Cooperative Governance of Climate Change. Sustainability, 13(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084363
Pokorny, B., Robiglio, V., Reyes, M., Vargas, R., & Patiño Carrera, C. F. (2021). The potential of agroforestry concessions to stabilize Amazonian forest frontiers: A case study on the economic and environmental robustness of informally settled small-scale cocoa farmers in Peru. Land Use Policy, 102. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105242
Putri, F. A. J., & Ehsonov, J. R. (2024). The Impact of Land Reform Policies on the Sustainable Management of Natural Resources in Local Communities. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i2.197
Rodríguez-de-Francisco, J. C., del Cairo, C., Ortiz-Gallego, D., Velez-Triana, J. S., Vergara-Gutiérrez, T., & Hein, J. (2021). Post-conflict transition and REDD+ in Colombia: Challenges to reducing deforestation in the Amazon. Forest Policy and Economics, 127, 102450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102450
Rompegading, A. M. & Maemanah. (2021). The Legal Standing of the Matteko Customary Law Community in the Judicial Review of the Law At the Constitutional Court. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(3), 608–628. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1836
Siagian, C. T. R. (2023). The Political Structure of Indonesia’s Regulation to Protection Customary Forest. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 3(1), 95–133. Scopus.
Sierra-Huelsz, J. A., Fernández, P. G., Binnqüist, C. L., Guibrunet, L., & Ellis, E. A. (2020). Traditional ecological knowledge in community forest management: Evolution and limitations in mexican forest law, policy and practice. Forests, 11(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/F11040403
Sloan, S., Campbell, M. J., Alamgir, M., Lechner, A. M., Engert, J., & Laurance, W. F. (2019). Trans-national conservation and infrastructure development in the Heart of Borneo. PLoS ONE, 14(9). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221947
Sopaheluwakan, W. R. I., Fatem, S. M., Kutanegara, P. M., & Maryudi, A. (2023). Two-decade decentralization and recognition of customary forest rights: Cases from special autonomy policy in West Papua, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 151, 102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102951
Stevens, M., Rawat, S., & Satterfield, T. (2025). Care, conflict, and coexistence: Human–wildlife relations in community forests. People and Nature, 7(1), 231–246. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10760
Tarigan, A. P. P., & Karuniasa, M. (2021). Analysis of agrarian conflict resolution through social forestry scheme. 716(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012082
Tran, T. M. A., Gagnon, V. S., & Schelly, C. (2025). A review of traditional ecological knowledge in resilient livelihoods and forest ecosystems: Lessons for restoration sciences and practices. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14728028.2024.2408725
Troell, J., & Keene, S. (2022). Legal Recognition of Customary Water Tenure in Sub-Saharan Africa: Unpacking the Land-Water Nexus. IWMI Research Report, 2022. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5337/2022.215
van Koppen, B. (2022). Living Customary Water Tenure in Rights-based Water Management in Sub-Saharan Africa. IWMI Research Report, 2022. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5337/2022.214
Wicaksono, A., Yunita, I., & Ginaya, G. (2022). Living side by side with nature: Evidence of self-governance in three local communities in Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12248
Xie, T., & Yuan, Y. (2023). Go with the wind: Spatial impacts of environmental regulations on economic activities in China. Journal of Development Economics, 164, 103139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103139
Zannini, P., Frascaroli, F., Nascimbene, J., Halley, J. M., Stara, K., Cervellini, M., Di Musciano, M., De Vigili, F., Rocchini, D., Piovesan, G., Alessi, N., & Chiarucci, A. (2022). Investigating sacred natural sites and protected areas for forest area changes in Italy. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(8). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12695
Zhunusova, E., Ahimbisibwe, V., Sen, L. T. H., Sadeghi, A., Toledo-Aceves, T., Kabwe, G., & Günter, S. (2022). Potential impacts of the proposed EU regulation on deforestation-free supply chains on smallholders, indigenous peoples, and local communities in producer countries outside the EU. Forest Policy and Economics, 143, 102817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102817
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rule of Law Studies Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.