Rethinking State Theory: Addressing Political Oligarchy and Dynastic Power in Indonesia

Rethinking State Theory: Addressing Political Oligarchy and Dynastic Power in Indonesia

Authors

  • Alya Sherillia Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Putri Naila Ramadhani Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Gifa Al-Khoiri Ramadhani Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Rudi Santoso Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64780/rolsj.v2i2.217

Keywords:

Dynastic Politics, Political Oligarchy, Power Distribution, State Theory

Abstract

Background: The persistence of political oligarchy and dynastic power in Indonesia suggests that power tends to be concentrated within certain groups, even within a formally democratic system. This condition raises questions about the extent to which existing state theory remains relevant in explaining contemporary political realities.

Aims: In response to this issue, this study aims to rethink state theory by examining its capacity to explain and address political oligarchy and dynastic power in Indonesia, while also identifying its theoretical limitations and exploring possible contextual reinterpretations.

Methods: This study adopts a qualitative conceptual approach based on a critical review of the literature. It draws on key perspectives in political science, including state theory and elite theory, and engages with prior studies and documented political developments in Indonesia through a process of analytical synthesis.

Result: The literature-based analysis indicates that conventional state theory does not fully capture the dynamics of concentrated power and the persistence of elite dominance across political generations. The presence of oligarchic structures and dynastic practices suggests that formal democratic institutions alone are insufficient to ensure an equitable distribution of power. These findings point to the need for a more context-sensitive understanding of the role and function of the state.

Conclusion: Rethinking state theory offers a more grounded and contextually relevant framework for interpreting contemporary power relations in Indonesia. This study contributes to narrowing the gap between theoretical assumptions and political practice, and highlights the importance of integrating empirical realities into the analysis of the state in emerging democracies.

References

Abdurahman, A. I., Shinta Dewi, E. A., Rizal, E., & Rahmat, A. (2025). Political dynasties in the age of democracy: A bibliometric study of global research patterns and future directions. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101735

Abidin, R. B. M. Z. (2024). Ratio Legis Investigation by the Prosecutor: A Review of Distribution of Power in Investigation of Corruption Crime. Media Iuris, 7(1), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v7i1.45772

Abizadeh, A. (2021). Representation, Bicameralism, Political Equality, and Sortition: Reconstituting the Second Chamber as a Randomly Selected Assembly. Perspectives on Politics, 19(3), 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719004626

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2022). Non-Modernization: Power–Culture Trajectories and the Dynamics of Political Institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(Volume 25, 2022), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-103913

Aggeborn, L., & Nyman, P. (2021). Intergenerational Transmission of Party Affiliation Within Political Families. Political Behavior, 43(2), 813–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09628-z

Alvarez, S. E. (2021). Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women’s Movements in Transition Politics. 1–320.

Dahal, N. (2025). Qualitative data analysis: Reflections, procedures, and some points for consideration. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1669578

Darnela, L., Azmi, F. S., & Sugitanata, A. (2025). The Dominant Influence of Islamic Law in Addressing the Challenges of Upholding the Rights of Rohingya Refugees. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 17(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v17i1.29885

Essex, R., Kennedy, J., Miller, D., & Jameson, J. (2023). A scoping review exploring the impact and negotiation of hierarchy in healthcare organisations. Nursing Inquiry, 30(4), e12571. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12571

Fauzan, Andiko, T., Kosasih, A., Rohmadi, Jalili, I., & Miinuddin. (2025). Local Wisdom-Based Democracy: A Fiqh Siyasah Analysis of the Gilir Kaum System in the Village Head Election in Sibak Village, Bengkulu. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani, 12(2), 711–726. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8991

Ghosh, A. K. (2023). Understanding layered dominance of political dynasties in India: A de-hyphenated reading of dynastic representation and dynasty-led parties. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(3), 727–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911221147657

Ingham, S. (2022). Representative Democracy and Social Equality. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542100109X

Karpen, I. O., Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., Jaakkola, E., & Conduit, J. (2023). Circular service management: Toward conceptual understanding and service research priorities for a more sustainable future. Journal of Service Management, 34(6), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-06-2023-0269

Khan, A., & Nasim, S. (2025). Mapping research on the subjective well-being of knowledge workers: A systematic enquiry deploying bibliometrics. Management Review Quarterly, 75(1), 911–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00399-5

Kowalski, C. P., Nevedal, A. L., Finley, E. P., Young, J. P., Lewinski, A. A., Midboe, A. M., & Hamilton, A. B. (2024). Planning for and Assessing Rigor in Rapid Qualitative Analysis (PARRQA): A consensus-based framework for designing, conducting, and reporting. Implementation Science, 19(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01397-1

Kustermans, J., & Horemans, R. (2022). Four Conceptions of Authority in International Relations. International Organization, 76(1), 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000230

Laštro, C., & Bieber, F. (2023). Democratic patterns and party systems in the Western Balkans. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 17(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-023-00564-w

Magistretti, S., Ardito, L., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2021). Framing the microfoundations of design thinking as a dynamic capability for innovation: Reconciling theory and practice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(6), 645–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12586

Marchevska, D., & Steen, T. (2022). Understanding policy influence in hybrid regimes: Insights from a qualitative study of policy advice in Ukraine and Moldova. Policy Studies Journal, 50(4), 735–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12477

Mathisen, R. B. (2023). Affluence and Influence in a Social Democracy. American Political Science Review, 117(2), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000739

Maynard, B. R. (2025). Research Synthesis Methods: A Guide for Conducting Rigorous and Relevant Reviews. Research on Social Work Practice, 35(6), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315251334150

Morales-Brown, L. A., Perez Algorta, G., & Salifu, Y. (2024). Understanding Experiences of Diabetes Distress: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2024(1), 3946553. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3946553

Nasution, F. A. (2024). Regional financial potential after the enactment of the law on the financial relations between central government and regional governments in Indonesia. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.8196

Nelson, L. K. (2021). Cycles of Conflict, a Century of Continuity: The Impact of Persistent Place-Based Political Logics on Social Movement Strategy. American Journal of Sociology, 127(1), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1086/714915

Qin, X., Chua, R. Y. J., Tan, L., Li, W., & Chen, C. (2023). Gender bias in cultural tightness across the 50 US states, its correlates, and links to gender inequality in leadership and innovation. PNAS Nexus, 2(8), pgad238. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad238

Sahlan, Miqat, N., & Susilawati, S. (2024). Realizing “Deconstructional” Justice Through Agrarian Civil Law Reform: A Review of Jacques Derrida’s Theory. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(3), 588–605. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i3.1559

Salam, S., Supardjo, S., & Nurlinda, I. (2024). The Evolution of Property Rights in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9(1), 217–248. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.vol9i1.3538

Salmon, H., & Lekipiouw, S. (2024). Division Construction Government Authority in Law Number 23 of 2014. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(4), 664–674. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i4.3516

Sunarto, A., Adnan, M. A., & Khair, A. (2025). Application of the Principles of Islamic Civil Law in Small and Medium Business Partnerships. Nurani, 25(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v25i1.25378

Vartavarian, M. (2023). Entangled oligarchies: Structure, agency and rent seeking in South Africa. Africa, 93(4), 562–578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001972023000657

Whittle, A., Vaara, E., & Maitlis, S. (2023). The Role of Language in Organizational Sensemaking: An Integrative Theoretical Framework and an Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Management, 49(6), 1807–1840. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221147295

Wibawa, K. C. S., Natalis, A., Ispriyarso, B., Ashari, D., Shinta Almira Nirboyo, R. R., & Calista, E. A. (2025). GREEN AMMONIA AND REVERSE AUCTIONS: A POLICY INNOVATION TOWARD INDONESIA’S NET ZERO GOAL. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science, 15(4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.31407/ijees15.445

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

Sherillia, A., Ramadhani, P. N., Ramadhani, G. A.-K., & Santoso, R. (2026). Rethinking State Theory: Addressing Political Oligarchy and Dynastic Power in Indonesia. Rule of Law Studies Journal, 2(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.64780/rolsj.v2i2.217
Loading...