Evaluating Concurrent Election Systems and Their Impact on Democratic Quality in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/rolsj.v2i1.216Keywords:
Concurrent elections, Democratic Quality, Electoral System Reform, Voter Participation, Institutional EffectivenessAbstract
Background: The implementation of concurrent elections in Indonesia represents a major political reform aimed at improving electoral efficiency and strengthening democratic governance. Despite these intentions, its application has generated ongoing debates regarding whether the system truly enhances democratic quality or instead introduces new challenges, such as increased electoral complexity and voter burden.
Aims: This study aims to evaluate the concurrent election system and analyze its impact on democratic quality in Indonesia.
Methods: This research adopts a quantitative approach by utilizing secondary data obtained from official election reports and democratic indicators. The analysis focuses on key dimensions of democratic quality, including voter participation, electoral competitiveness, and institutional performance. The data were examined using both descriptive and inferential statistical techniques to identify patterns and relationships between the implementation of concurrent elections and democratic outcomes.
Result: The findings indicate that the implementation of concurrent elections tends to increase voter participation and improve administrative efficiency. However, the complexity of the electoral system also affects voters’ understanding and may influence the clarity of political representation as well as institutional effectiveness.
Conclusion: Overall, the concurrent election system in Indonesia produces mixed effects on democratic quality. Therefore, policy adjustments and institutional strengthening are necessary to ensure that the system contributes more effectively to democratic consolidation.
References
Al-Hamdi, R., Lailam, T., Sakir, S., & Subekti, D. (2025). How to mitigate money politics in the electoral contest? Impediment detection, bibliometrics analysis and proposed design. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2520446
Arifin, F., Maarif, I., Suryana, C., Sugiarti, T., & Murbani, A. W. (2025). Institutional Configuration and Competence of the Special Judiciary for Regional Election Disputes: A Comparative Study and Prospects for Implementation. Jambura Law Review, 7(2), 493–520. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i2.30949
Asimakopoulos, G., Antonopoulou, H., Giotopoulos, K., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Democratic Processes and Citizen Participation. Societies, 15(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15020040
Bagja, R., Isra, S., Palguna, I. D. G., Fahmi, K., & Ezzerouali, S. A. (2025). Towards Electoral Justice: Redesigning an Ideal System for Enforcing Electoral Administrative Law in Indonesia? Jambe Law Journal, 8(2), 781–814. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.8.2.781-814
Boese, V. A., Gates, S., Knutsen, C. H., Nygård, H. M., & Strand, H. (2022). Patterns of Democracy over Space and Time. International Studies Quarterly, 66(3), sqac041. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqac041
Bolet, D., Green, F., & González-Eguino, M. (2024). How to Get Coal Country to Vote for Climate Policy: The Effect of a “Just Transition Agreement” on Spanish Election Results. American Political Science Review, 118(3), 1344–1359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001235
Daoust, J.-F., Plescia, C., & Blais, A. (2023). Are People More Satisfied with Democracy When They Feel They Won the Election? No. Political Studies Review, 21(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299211058390
Fossati, D. (2024). Illiberal resistance to democratic backsliding: The case of radical political Islam in Indonesia. Democratization, 31(3), 616–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2210504
Hirose, M., & Creswell, J. W. (2023). Applying Core Quality Criteria of Mixed Methods Research to an Empirical Study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221086346
Huda, U. N., Arifin, F., Susanto, A. F., & Abdullah, M. K. (2025). Evaluating the Election Law in Indonesia for Strengthening Democracy and Ensuring Honest and Fair Elections. Law Reform: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 21(2), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v21i2.66848
Kostelka, F., Krejcova, E., Sauger, N., & Wuttke, A. (2023). Election Frequency and Voter Turnout. Comparative Political Studies, 56(14), 2231–2268. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231169020
Madueke, O., & Enyiazu, C. (2025). Electoral Integrity and Election Management in Nigeria: The Case of the 2023 General Election. World Affairs, 188(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/waf2.12055
Mauk, M. (2022). Electoral integrity matters: How electoral process conditions the relationship between political losing and political trust. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1709–1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01050-1
Mietzner, M. (2022). Sources of resistance to democratic decline: Indonesian civil society and its trials. In Democratic Regressions in Asia. Routledge.
Mindarti, L. I., Malik, A., Supriyono, B., & Hermawan. (2021). Quality of Regional Election Implementation as Determinant of Performance of Simultaneous Regional Election: Community Trust and Satisfaction as Mediation, and Regulatory Harmonization as Moderation. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 24(01), 2150008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091521500089
Mohamad, E. (2025). Implementation of Mixed-Election System as a Way to Purify Indonesian Presidential System. Jurnal Konstitusi, 22(3), 528–553. https://doi.org/10.31078/JK2236
Mubiina, F. A. (2020). Position of the Faction in the People’s Representative of the Republic of Indonesia Post Reform. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(2), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk17210
Primerano, I., Marchesini, N., Santelli, F., Taddei, L., & Cerbara, L. (2026). Secondary, Longitudinal, and Panel Data in Social Science Research. In L. Taddei & M. Paolucci (Eds.), Longitudinal Data Infrastructures in Europe: Tools for Open Science in Social Science Research (pp. 19–35). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-07005-0_2
Sistyawan, D. J., Judijanto, L., Zulkifli, S., Neonbeni, R. V., & Pakarti, M. H. A. (2025). TRANSFORMATION OF INDONESIA’S LEGISLATIVE ELECTION SYSTEM: NEW ORDER VS REFORM ERA IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. IIUM Law Journal, 33(1), 325–375. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v33i1.1006
Steele, C. A., Pemstein, D., & Meserve, S. A. (2021). Democracy promotion and electoral quality: A disaggregated analysis. Governance, 34(2), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12526
Stępień, P., & Pierzgalski, M. (2025). Uncontested Seats Phenomenon: How Too Small Electoral Districts Destroy Local Democracies. Representation, 61(4), 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2025.2494595
Stockemer, D., Thompson, H., & Sundström, A. (2023). Young adults’ under-representation in elections to the U.S. House of Representatives. Electoral Studies, 81, 102554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102554
Sudarmanto, K., Arifin, Z., Kusudarmanto, A. M. R. A., & Jain, V. (2025). Electoral Law Reform from the Perspective of Responsive Justice: A Comparison of Indonesia, India, and Australia. Jambe Law Journal, 8(1), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v8i1.513
Tyson, A., & Nawawi. (2022). Dictators Never Die: Political Transition, Dynastic Regime Recovery and the 2021 Suharto Commemoration in Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 44(3), 421–452. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs44-3i
Wagner, A., & Krause, W. (2023). Putting electoral competition where it belongs: Comparing vote-based measures of electoral competition. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 33(2), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2020.1866584
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nadya Syalum Ramadhani, Muhammad Ikhsan Wicaksana, Muhammad Zaky Andriano, Rudi Santoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.