Legal Review of Disputes Between Indigenous Communities and the Government Regarding Territorial Boundaries (Case Study of Marampa Village, Rongkong District, North Luwu Regency)

Legal Review of Disputes Between Indigenous Communities and the Government Regarding Territorial Boundaries (Case Study of Marampa Village, Rongkong District, North Luwu Regency)

Authors

  • Anggun Sari Sahid Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo
  • Abdain Abdain Institut Agama Islam Negeri (Iain) Palopo
  • Anita Marwing Institut Agama Islam Negeri (Iain) Palopo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64780/rolsj.v2i1.211

Keywords:

customary community; territorial boundaries; legal disputes.

Abstract

Background:Disputes between indigenous communities and the government over territorial boundaries are a common occurrence in various regions across Indonesia. These conflicts are generally triggered by differing perspectives on determining territorial boundaries, with indigenous communities using a historical and traditional approach, while the government uses a formal administrative and mapping approach.

Aims:This study aims to legally analyze the dispute between indigenous peoples and the government regarding territorial boundaries in Marampa Village, Rongkong District, North Luwu Regency, and to identify the factors causing the conflict and efforts to resolve it.

Methods:This research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive design. The approach employed includes normative and historical juridical approaches. Data were obtained through observation, interviews, and documentation, involving indigenous communities and village government officials as research informants. The data were then analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing.

Result:The research results indicate that disputes between indigenous communities and the government regarding territorial boundaries are caused by differences in boundary determination methods, village expansion, lack of communication between indigenous communities and the government, and the government's lack of attention to the recognition of customary territories. Efforts to resolve the conflict are carried out through deliberation between the two parties and participatory mapping of customary territories.

Conclusion: Boundary disputes between indigenous communities and the government are influenced by differing approaches to defining territory and a lack of coordination between the two parties. Therefore, more participatory policies and clearer legal recognition of indigenous territories are needed to minimize similar conflicts in the future.

References

Aulia, DR, Putro, H., & Mufidah, LD (2023). The Problem of Protecting Indigenous Peoples' Rights in the Development of the New Capital City. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(2), 2299–3010.

Bramantyo, RY, & Setiono, GC (2022). Implementation of Article 18b Paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution concerning State Recognition of Customary Norms from the Religious and Ritualistic Perspective of the Temboro Hamlet Community, Wates District, Kediri Regency. Legal Transparency. https://doi.org/10.30737/transparansi.v0i0.3688

Fuzain, NA (2023). Land Dispute Conflict Between the Rempang Indigenous Community and the Batam Free Trade Zone Authority (BP Batam) Regarding the Development of Rempang Eco City. Wara Sains Journal of Law and Human Rights, 2(11). https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i11.798

Harniwati, H. (2024). Customary Law in the Era of Modernization. Journal of Global Legal Review, 2(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.59963/jglegar.v2i1.328

Jabarudin, J., & Karmila, K. (2022). Regional Government Authority to Determine Customary Land in Regional Regulations. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Scientific Journal in the Fields of Social, Economic, Cultural, Technology, and Education, 1(3), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i3.25

Jemarut, W., Solikatun, S., & Rizal, P. (2022). Legal Study of Indigenous Legal Communities. Widya Yuridika, 5(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i1.2494

Khoirudin, MZ, Erawati, D., & Syamsuri, S. (2021). The Hegemony of Palm Oil Plantation Companies Over the Communities of Central Kalimantan in Resolving Land Disputes. Proceedings of the Palangka Raya International and National Conference on Islamic Studies (PINCIS), 1(1). https://e-proceedings.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/PICIS/article/view/485

Laimeheriwa, SH, & Wargadinata, E. (2020). Dynamics of Traditional Village Governance in Southeast Maluku. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v6i1.22292

Lubis, AF (2022). Handling the Conflict of Indigenous Communities in West Papua Through an Anthropological Approach by the Indonesian National Armed Forces. Jurnal Pustaka Mitra (Center for Access to Community Service Studies), 2(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.55382/jurnalpustakamitra.v2i1.113

Meiranda, A., Syamsunasir, S., Sukendro, A., & Widodo, P. (2023). Legal Efforts to Resolve Customary Land Disputes in Kampar Regency to Maintain National Security. Journal of Legal Analysis, 6(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v6i1.4232

Pareke, JT, & Arisandi, F. (2020). Recognition of Indigenous Legal Communities and Protection of Indigenous Territories in Rejang Lebong Regency. Environmental Law Development, 4(2), 313–328.

Putra, PA, Hermana, MA, & Apriyanto, S. (2020). Implementation of Regional Autonomy Policy in Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution from the Perspective of Legal Politics in Indonesia. BATARADARMA Journal (Law Studies), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.37638/bataradarma.v1i1.165

Putri, RR (2017). Constitution and Customary Law Communities: Reviewing the Recognition and Protection of the Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights of Customary Law Communities in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Padjadjaran Law Review, 5. https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/plr/article/view/466

Riyadi, I., Prabowo, EA, & Hakim, D. (2024). The Role of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika in Cultural Diversity in Indonesia. Jaksa: Journal of Legal and Political Studies, 2(3), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v2i3.1870

Simamora, IMM, Apricia, N., Putri, SS, Ajo, FLET, & Andinda, CO (2023). Legal Protection of Customary Rights of Indigenous Communities Against the Takeover of Customary Land by the State. Journal of History Education and Social Humanities Research, 3(3), 353–359.

Sopian, S., Agustiana, DM, Heryati, E., Nova, N., & Ruslandi, R. (2023). The Governance System of the Baduy Customary Law Community of Banten. Journal of Citizenship Virtues, 3(2), 621–629. https://doi.org/10.37640/jcv.v3i2.1877

Sumaya, PS (2025). Conflict Between Customary Law and State Law: Challenges of Upholding Justice in Indigenous Communities. MANIFESTO Journal of Communication, Politics, and Cultural Ideas, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.61434/manifesto.v3i2.308

Tsurayya, A., Darnia, ME, Mustafarsyach, MA, & Utami, W. (2024). Analysis of Land Disputes Between Palm Oil Plantation Companies and Village Communities. Wahana Pendidikan Scientific Journal, 10(11), 430–434. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12731220

Tutuhatunewa, AR, Sirait, J., & Ubra, E. (2023). Cultural Communication Patterns in Traditional Weddings in the Ohoi Ohoirenan Village, Southeast Maluku Regency. BADATI JOURNAL, 5(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.38012/jb.v8i2.1122

Waluyo, BD (2023). Customary Land Issues: Mistakes in Government Communication or Failures in Regulatory and Policy Messages in Indonesia. ALADALAH: Journal of Politics, Social Affairs, Law, and Humanities, 1(1), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v1i1.280

Zahra, M. (2025). Building National Identity Amidst Diversity: The Role of Multiculturalism in Indonesian Unity: DOI 10.58569/jies.v3i2.1115. Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 3(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.58569/jies.v3i2.1115

Downloads

Published

2026-03-16

How to Cite

Sari Sahid, A., Abdain, A., & Marwing, A. (2026). Legal Review of Disputes Between Indigenous Communities and the Government Regarding Territorial Boundaries (Case Study of Marampa Village, Rongkong District, North Luwu Regency). Rule of Law Studies Journal, 2(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.64780/rolsj.v2i1.211
Loading...