Justice Beyond Legal Formalism: A Maslahah-Oriented Reading of Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia through Rawls and Hamka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64780/rolsj.v1i4.167Keywords:
Criminal law enforcement; , justice theory; , legal formalism; , maslahah; , moral responsibility;Abstract
Background: Criminal law enforcement in Indonesia is still widely understood as a matter of procedural compliance and formal proof, while the dimension of justice experienced by society often remains marginal.
Aims: This article aims to reread criminal law enforcement by positioning maslahah as an evaluative horizon and placing it in dialogue with the ideas of justice developed by John Rawls and Buya Hamka, in order to articulate a more humane and equitable normative direction.
Methods: This study adopts a qualitative normative–philosophical approach based on library research. The analysis draws on major works by Rawls and Buya Hamka, supported by literature on criminal law enforcement and maslahah theory. Analytical reasoning is guided by the concepts of maslahah mursalah and maslahah mu‘tabarah to assess legal objectives, public benefit, and potential harm within criminal law practices.
Result: The analysis reveals that criminal law enforcement in Indonesia tends to prioritize procedural legality and punishment, while insufficiently addressing the protection of vulnerable groups and the restoration of social balance. A maslahah-oriented reading highlights the need to consider public benefit, harm prevention, and the safeguarding of human dignity as more adequate criteria for evaluating criminal law enforcement.
Conclusion: Moving beyond legal formalism requires an ethical framework capable of bridging distributive justice and conscience-based justice. Anchored in maslahah, the conceptual dialogue between Rawls and Hamka provides a normative foundation for strengthening substantive justice and enhancing the legitimacy and public trust of Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
References
Ambrosini, M. (2023). Moral economy and deservingness in immigration policies. The case of regularisations in Italy. Ethnicities, 23(2), 306–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968221117544
Angell, K. (2023). Should Rawlsian end-state principles be constrained by popular beliefs about justice? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2023.2247313
Apriansah, A., Mulyatini, N., & Prabowo*, F. H. E. (2022). FINANCIAL WELL-BEING: A WAY TO MAINTAIN LONG-TERM FINANCIAL SECURITY. JURISMA : Jurnal Riset Bisnis & Manajemen, 12(2), 230–252. https://doi.org/10.34010/jurisma.v12i2.5432
Carlsson, V. (2025). Legal certainty in automated decision-making in welfare services. Public Policy and Administration, 40(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231202334
Clements, P., & Formosa, P. (2021). Beyond Ideal Theory: Foundations for a Critical Rawlsian Theory of Climate Justice. New Political Science, 43(4), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2021.1994842
Darmawan, J. B., Suhariadi, F., Widjojo, S., Amiati, M., & Abdullah, A. H. (2025). Incorporating Islah Principles into Restorative Justice: Bridging Contemporary Legal Practice and Islamic Values. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(1), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10435
Faisal, Yanto, A., Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., Darmawan, A., & Manik, J. D. N. (2024). Genuine paradigm of criminal justice: Rethinking penal reform within Indonesia New Criminal Code. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2301634. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2301634
Grenfell, P., Stuart, R., Eastham, J., Gallagher, A., Elmes, J., Platt, L., & O’Neill, M. (2023). Policing and public health interventions into sex workers’ lives: Necropolitical assemblages and alternative visions of social justice. Critical Public Health, 33(3), 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2022.2096428
Grossmann, K., & Trubina, E. (2021). How the Concept of Dignity Is Relevant to the Study of Energy Poverty and Energy Justice. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.644231
Ibrahim, A. H., & Harun, M. S. (2024). Applying the Concepts of Benefit and Harm in Malaysian Bioethical Discourse: Analysis of Malaysian Fatwa. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 21(3), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-024-10345-z
Ibrahim, Z., Karimullah, S., Assaad, A., Septiani, R., & Okur, H. (2025). Integration of Maqasid al-Shariah in the Criminal Law Reform to Achieve Justice and Human Dignity. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v23i1.04
Kiran, N., Iqbal, R., & Jawwad, M. (2023). JOHN RAWLS ON CONCEPTS OF RIGHTS AND JUSTICE IN PHILOSOPHY OF LAW. Russian Law Journal, 11(3), 2067–2079.
Kubrin, C. E., & Tublitz, R. (2022). How to Think about Criminal Justice Reform: Conceptual and Practical Considerations. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(6), 1050–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09712-6
Lubis, F. (2023). IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE, THE INTENT OF PUNISHMENT, AND LEGAL CLARITY IN INDONESIA. Russian Law Journal, 11(3), 813–823.
Martin, D. A., Conlon, E., & Bowe, B. (2021). A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(5), 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6
Moreto, W. D., & Charlton, R. (2021). Rangers can’t be with every elephant: Assessing rangers’ perceptions of a community, problem-solving policing model for protected areas. Oryx, 55(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001461
Musmuliadin, M., Indarti, E., & Rochaeti, N. (2024). REVOLUTIONIZING JUSTICE: LAW ENFORCEMENT THROUGH THE LENS OF PROGRESSIVE LAW. Indonesia Law Review, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v14n3.3
Nafid, Y., Haidass, M. A., & Joraiche, S. (2024). The Role of Criminal Alternatives as a Future Challenge in Achieving Security. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 19(1), 552–586.
Rönnegard, D., & Smith, N. C. (2024). A Rawlsian Rule for Corporate Governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 190(2), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05333-z
Sari, I. P., Wahyuningsih, S. E., & Sulistiyono, A. (2025). Legal Justice in Government and Private Sector Partnership Projects: A Justice Approach Based on Pancasila and Rawls. The Journal of Academic Science, 2(6), 1598–1602. https://doi.org/10.59613/qd2fe798
Simmler, M., Canova, G., & Schedler, K. (2023). Smart criminal justice: Phenomena and normative requirements1. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(2), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211039740
Simon, J. (2025). Dignity Defied: Legal-Rational Myths and the Surplus Legitimacy of the Carceral State. Law & Social Inquiry, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2024.40
Solehudin, E., Huda, M., Ahyani, H., Ahmad, M. Y., Khafidz, H. A., Rahman, E. T., & Hidayat, Moh. S. (2024). Transformation of Shariah Economic Justice: Ethical and Utility Perspectives in the framework of Maqashid Shariah. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 24(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i1.1467
Tavares, V. (2024). Feeling excluded: International students experience equity, diversity and inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(8), 1551–1568. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.2008536
Tripathi, J. P., Bugalia, S., Burdak, K., & Abbas, S. (2021). Dynamical analysis and effects of law enforcement in a social interaction model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 567, 125725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125725
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Moh Safik, Mu’tashim Billah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.