Managing Digital Notifications and Stress: Evidence from a Hybrid Laboratory and Field Study on Cognitive Load, HRV, and Well-being

Managing Digital Notifications and Stress: Evidence from a Hybrid Laboratory and Field Study on Cognitive Load, HRV, and Well-being

Authors

  • Husnain Mukhdoom Famous Forum of Worldwide Collaborators, Lahore (Pakistan)
  • Joseph A. Villarama Central Luzon State University (Philippines)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64780/msl.v1i1.110

Keywords:

Digital Notifications, Stress Management, Cognitive Load, Heart Rate Variability, Digital Well-being

Abstract

Modern stress is suspected to be caused by constant digital notifications and fast task switching but causal data and applicable solutions are still in pieces. Our study is a hybrid study (A) (N=120) a laboratory experiment (randomization) comparing constant (control) and 15-minute batch notification (group) participants completing single- and dual-task blocks (2-back, Stroop, SART, email triage); and (B) a 14-day A-B-A field study (N=100) of a pragmatic bundle-system Focus/Do-Not-Disturb with a priority allow-list, batched releases, two daily 50-minute focus blocks, and scheduled email Constant notifications at the lab raised workload (NASA-TLX), decreased RMSSD, and worsened accuracy, and bigger penalties were raised in the case of the dual-task demand. Intervention, in the field, decreased the rate of notification (~50%), decreased EMA stress (~6.5 points) and enhanced morning RMSSD (~5-6 ms); all of which recovered partially on washout. Multilevel models demonstrated dose-response associations between notification rate, stress and HRV; within-person mediation was in a relationship with interruptions -cognitive load -stress pathway. There was greater higher media multitasking benefits, smaller benefits from higher self-control, and greater benefits from FoMO and trait anxiety. The results justify the use of a stratified process in form of device defaults, workflow organization and team norms to harmonize the ecology of notification with attentional boundaries of humans.

References

[1] S. F. Ahmad et al., "Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education," Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 311, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01787-8

[2] P. R. Brandao, "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Modern Society," AI, vol. 6, no. 8, p. 190, Aug. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6080190

[3] B. B. Mumcu and A. Çebi, "You have a notification: the role of push notifications in shaping students' engagement, self-regulation and academic procrastination," Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, p. 36, Jun. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00537-x

[4] S. Ohly and L. Bastin, "Effects of task interruptions caused by notifications from communication applications on strain and performance," J. Occup. Health, vol. 65, no. 1, Jan. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12408

[5] F. Jabeen, A. Tandon, J. Sithipolvanichgul, S. Srivastava, and A. Dhir, "Social media-induced fear of missing out (FoMO) and social media fatigue: The role of narcissism, comparison and disclosure," J. Bus. Res., vol. 159, p. 113693, Apr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113693

[6] T. Nesbit and L. Lole, "A Qualitative Investigation of Social Media Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and Needs Fulfilment Among Young Adults," Int. J. Human-Computer Interact., pp. 1-17, Aug. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2543998

[7] P. A. Busch and S. McCarthy, "Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: A systematic literature review of an emerging research area," Comput. Human Behav., vol. 114, p. 106414, Jan. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106414

[8] C. J. Lin and H. Jia, "Time Pressure Affects the Risk Preference and Outcome Evaluation," Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 3205, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043205

[9] J. Giovanniello, C. Bravo-Rivera, A. Rosenkranz, and K. Matthew Lattal, "Stress, associative learning, and decision-making," Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., vol. 204, p. 107812, Oct. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107812

[10] J. Yang, J. Ma, and L. Li, "The relationship between performance appraisal interval and employees' proactive working behavior - analysis based on time-gain effect and time-loss effect," Front. Psychol., vol. 14, Aug. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213547

[11] N. Koundal et al., "Effect of Interruptions and Cognitive Demand on Mental Workload: A Critical Review," IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 54405-54425, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3383142

[12] F. Schmitz and R. J. Krämer, "Task Switching: On the Relation of Cognitive Flexibility with Cognitive Capacity," J. Intell., vol. 11, no. 4, p. 68, Mar. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11040068

[13] V. B. Rick et al., "What really bothers us about work interruptions? Investigating the characteristics of work interruptions and their effects on office workers," Work Stress, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 157-181, Apr. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2024.2303527

[14] Y. Chen, W. Fang, B. Guo, and H. Bao, "Fatigue-Related Effects in the Process of Task Interruption on Working Memory," Front. Hum. Neurosci., vol. 15, Nov. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.703422

[15] S. Xu and N. G. Hall, "Fatigue, personnel scheduling and operations: Review and research opportunities," Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 295, no. 3, pp. 807-822, Dec. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.03.036

[16] J. N. Ruse, E. Schraube, and P. Rhodes, "Left to their own devices: the significance of mental health apps on the construction of therapy and care," Subjectivity, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 410-428, Dec. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-024-00195-w

[17] A. Darley, B. Coughlan, R. Maguire, L. McCann, and E. Furlong, "A bridge from uncertainty to understanding: The meaning of symptom management digital health technology during cancer treatment," Digit. Heal., vol. 9, Jan. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231152163

[18] J. Lynch, G. Hughes, C. Papoutsi, J. Wherton, and C. A'Court, "'It's no good but at least I've always got it round my neck': A postphenomenological analysis of reassurance in assistive technology use by older people," Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 292, p. 114553, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114553

[19] X. Pan, X. Zhao, and H. Shen, "The concept, influence, and mechanism of human work interruptions based on the grounded theory," Front. Psychol., vol. 14, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1044233

[20] R. B. Brockbank and D. F. Feldon, "Cognitive Reappraisal: The Bridge between Cognitive Load and Emotion," Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 8, p. 870, Aug. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080870

Downloads

Published

2025-10-02

How to Cite

Mukhdoom, H., & A. Villarama, J. (2025). Managing Digital Notifications and Stress: Evidence from a Hybrid Laboratory and Field Study on Cognitive Load, HRV, and Well-being. Management, Sustainability, and Life Span, 1(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.64780/msl.v1i1.110

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...